# Car hitting a tree - calculating the force?

• fawk3s
In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of time and force in a car collision with a tree. Various factors such as the cars' crumple zones and the tree's resistance are considered. The concept of impulse is also mentioned. The conversation also touches on the calculation of force in a collision between two cars. It is clarified that the net force being zero does not mean no force is exerted.
fawk3s
So a car hits a tree.

F=ma

So let's say it was driving at 90 km/h = 25 m/s, and after the crash let's say its speed was 0 m/s.
a=v-v0/t

But how could I calculate the t?

This is not a homework question.

fawk3s

There's no simple way to get the time. It depends on too many factors.

The cars crumple zones crumples. The tree bends and breaks. In fact maybe the tree is knocked down and the car keeps going with some velocity less than the initial velocity. But let's say it is a big solid tree so that the car will come to rest after the tree plows four feet (about 1.2 meters) into the crumple zone what does this get us?

I get about 0.096 sec to stop and a=260m/sec^2= about 26.6gees let's hope there is an air bag.

I used d=0.5*a*t^2 + v*t
and v=a*t
with d=1.2m and v=25m/sec

In case of calculating time in a collision, it is a complex job

actually, when we are considering ideal rigid bodies, or point masses, we assume the collisions to be instantaneousbut in the practical world, whenever a collision takes place, a part of the interacting bodies compress, and the compressed part in turn exert a resistive forcethe time has to be calculated experimentally by the help of high speed cameras
thus we use the quantity impluse

edpell said:
The cars crumple zones crumples. The tree bends and breaks. In fact maybe the tree is knocked down and the car keeps going with some velocity less than the initial velocity. But let's say it is a big solid tree so that the car will come to rest after the tree plows four feet (about 1.2 meters) into the crumple zone what does this get us?

I get about 0.096 sec to stop and a=260m/sec^2= about 26.6gees let's hope there is an air bag.

I used d=0.5*a*t^2 + v*t
and v=a*t
with d=1.2m and v=25m/sec

There are so many things confusing me here.

Firstly, the d=1.2 is taken pretty randomly, but then, let it be. (Though I was actually thinking about a situation where the tree stands its ground.)
Then how do you solve the first equation and for what exactly?
And how can you tell that the tree is going to be moving at 25m/s after the time t?

fawk3s

fawk3s, the tree does hold its ground the car crumples. The tree is moving with an initial velocity of 25m/s with respect to the car because that is what you stated in the problem. At the end of the event the tree and the car are standing still with respect to each other so 25m/s=t*a so a=25/t m/sec^2 substitute into the first equation and solve for t given we have d=1.2m. Yes, 1.2m is semi-random but seems a typical value from the experimental data of seeing cars after impacts.

I guess you wanted the force well we have a=26g so what is the weight of the car? 1000lbs times 26g force in lbs is 26,000 lbs.

Hi guys, i could be wrong but see if this make sense?

Assuming the tree keep standing after the impact of the car, the kinetic energy involved are changed into other form of energy by deforming the car(heat, sound etc...).
Let's say the car weight m kg, we have m and we have v, so we can get the kinetic energy, so if we know how much distance did the car move after impact before it comes to a total stop (how much the car crumbled inwards), if the OP wants the force, then we can use the work = force x distance formula to get the force applied? Does it look right to you guys?

And this lead me to ask a question myself, i hope u guys don't mind :D. If i have 2 cars (with same mass and speed), one moving from east, and one moving from west, then when they collide, there will be no net momentum (meaning both car with stop), but what about the force involved? in my mind both cars should have the same deformation inward (assuming they are exact same car), but if i go Newtons 3rd law, car A exert force on car B, car B exert same force back on car A, then the force cancels out, and no net force = no damage which doesn't make sense, what am i thinking wrong?

Thanks!

And this lead me to ask a question myself, i hope u guys don't mind :D. If i have 2 cars (with same mass and speed), one moving from east, and one moving from west, then when they collide, there will be no net momentum (meaning both car with stop), but what about the force involved? in my mind both cars should have the same deformation inward (assuming they are exact same car), but if i go Newtons 3rd law, car A exert force on car B, car B exert same force back on car A, then the force cancels out, and no net force = no damage which doesn't make sense, what am i thinking wrong?
Several confusions here:
(1) The forces involved in Newton's 3rd law act on different objects, so they don't directly 'cancel out'. What determines what happens to car A is the force on car A. Just because car A also exerts an equal force on car B doesn't make the force on car A disappear.
(2) Net force = 0 is not the same as no force! Imagine an elephant stepping on your foot. The net force on your foot is zero: The downward force of the elephant is balanced by the upward force from the ground. But your foot is still crushed.

thx for the answer doc, but something on the 3rd law still doesn't make sense tho, can you please clarify it for me?
if i draw the free body diagram of the whole system (car A and B), then it will look something like this (ignoring gravity): Fa=> Car A; Car B <=Fb. Even though the forces cancel out, there will still be damages due to the fact that there were forces on the individual cars.

If i only draw the FBD of car A, it will look like this: Fa=> car A <=Fb to a (Fb to a = force from car b to car a) And the FBD for car b alone will be vice versa.

But then i am not too sure what do you mean by the forces involved in Newton's 3rd law acts on different objects? Because to me, it actually looks like the forces act on both cars?

Thanks!

(and is my approach in finding the F in my previous post correct? thanks again!

But then i am not too sure what do you mean by the forces involved in Newton's 3rd law acts on different objects? Because to me, it actually looks like the forces act on both cars?
The force exerted by car A on car B acts on car B; The equal and opposite force exerted by car B on car A acts on car A.

(and is my approach in finding the F in my previous post correct?)
If you know the distance traveled by the car's center of mass as it comes to rest (or the time it takes for the car to come to rest) then you can calculate the average force on the car as you suggest.

Thanks Doc! :)

edpell said:
fawk3s, the tree does hold its ground the car crumples. The tree is moving with an initial velocity of 25m/s with respect to the car because that is what you stated in the problem. At the end of the event the tree and the car are standing still with respect to each other so 25m/s=t*a so a=25/t m/sec^2 substitute into the first equation and solve for t given we have d=1.2m. Yes, 1.2m is semi-random but seems a typical value from the experimental data of seeing cars after impacts.

I guess you wanted the force well we have a=26g so what is the weight of the car? 1000lbs times 26g force in lbs is 26,000 lbs.

Oh, right. Think I get it now. I don't know what exactly confused me but I couldn't connect these things the first time.
Thanks!

## 1. How is the force of a car hitting a tree calculated?

The force of a car hitting a tree is calculated using the formula F = m x a, where F is force, m is mass, and a is acceleration. The mass of the car and the speed at which it is traveling before impact are used to determine the force of the collision.

## 2. What factors affect the force of a car hitting a tree?

The force of a car hitting a tree can be affected by several factors, including the mass of the car, the speed of the car, the angle of impact, and the type of tree. The condition of the car, such as whether it has functioning brakes or airbags, can also play a role in the force of the collision.

## 3. Can the force of a car hitting a tree be fatal?

Yes, the force of a car hitting a tree can be fatal. The force of the impact can cause severe injuries to the passengers inside the car, including head injuries, internal bleeding, and broken bones. It is important to always wear a seatbelt and follow traffic laws to reduce the risk of a fatal collision.

## 4. How does the force of a car hitting a tree compare to other types of collisions?

The force of a car hitting a tree can vary greatly depending on the circumstances, but it is generally considered to be a high-impact collision. It can be more forceful than a car hitting another car of similar size, but less forceful than a car hitting a solid concrete barrier.

## 5. Can the force of a car hitting a tree be reduced?

Yes, the force of a car hitting a tree can be reduced by implementing safety features such as seatbelts, airbags, and crumple zones on cars. Additionally, following traffic laws and driving at safe speeds can also help reduce the force of a collision with a tree.

• Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
120
• Mechanics
Replies
3
Views
284
• Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
748
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
630
• Mechanics
Replies
6
Views
3K
• Mechanics
Replies
5
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
57
Views
656
• Mechanics
Replies
4
Views
3K
• Classical Physics
Replies
46
Views
3K
• Mechanics
Replies
9
Views
913