Car Oscillation Amplitude: Frequency & Constant Values

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jamessamuel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resonance
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between a car's vertical oscillation amplitude and the frequency of an oscillating surface, with an emphasis on the constant amplitude of the surface. Participants analyze how the car's amplitude aligns with the surface's oscillation, questioning whether this occurs at low frequencies or at resonance. There is mention of a misleading graph, particularly regarding its right-hand tail, which should approach zero asymptotically. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in the graph to better understand the oscillation dynamics. Overall, the participants seek to clarify the conditions under which the car's oscillation amplitude is most affected by the surface's frequency.
Jamessamuel
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The graph (see image in part 3) illustrates how the amplitude of a car's vertical oscilltions vary withthe frequency of an oscillating surface. I was asked to state the amplitude of the oscillation of the surface. I was told It stayed constant.

Homework Equations


Nil

The Attempt at a Solution


I narrowed it down to x and y. However I cannot justify one over the other.
1433674956109.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamessamuel said:
I was asked to state the amplitude of the oscillation of the surface. I was told It stayed constant.
And you can clearly see where the resonance is. Now, when do you think that the car's amplitude most closely follows the oscillation of the surface - at a very low frequency (for example when the oscillation period is 10 minutes) or at resonance?
 
The given curve is a bit misleading. The right-hand tail should be asymptotically zero.
 
haruspex said:
The given curve is a bit misleading. The right-hand tail should be asymptotically zero.
Might be, might it not?
 
Jamessamuel said:

Homework Statement


The graph (see image in part 3) illustrates how the amplitude of a car's vertical oscilltions vary withthe frequency of an oscillating surface. I was asked to state the amplitude of the oscillation of the surface. I was told It stayed constant.

Homework Equations


Nil

The Attempt at a Solution


I narrowed it down to x and y. However I cannot justify one over the other. View attachment 84563
Svein has the good clue for you.
 
rude man said:
Might be, might it not?
Sure, the curve shown doesn't rule it out, but it could be made clearer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top