Carbon Attraction: Why Does Diamond Not Disappear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GAGS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Oxygen
AI Thread Summary
Carbon atoms in diamond do not readily react with oxygen due to the stability of the carbon-carbon bonds within the diamond structure. While carbon does attract oxygen more than it attracts itself, the reaction requires a certain activation energy to overcome the stability of the diamond. High-velocity interactions with oxygen could potentially lead to combustion, but this is not a common occurrence under normal conditions. The discussion highlights that while diamonds can burn, they remain stable unless specific conditions are met. Thus, diamonds do not disappear because the energy barrier for combustion is not typically reached.
GAGS
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi all,sorry if i commit any mistake while asking this question.
Actually right now i am studying FEYNMAN lectures of physics vol.1.ON page 7 of chapter1 it is written and clearly understood that Carbon attracts Oxygen much more than carbon attracts carbon or oxygen atttracts oxygen.
But if its ok then question arises The diamond should get disappear as carbon atoms in it must interact with oxygen. Similar cases should be arises with other substances containing carbon?
I hope the question is clear to you.
Sorry ,if commited any mistake.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


He was talking about free atoms, not atoms already locked in a chemical bond.
 


But sir, then what will happen if oxygen atom approaches with high velocity?. (In short air may blow fast)??
 


According to this article, diamond can burn:
http://chemistry.about.com/cs/geochemistry/a/aa071801a.htm

Presumably this means that diamond would like to combine with oxygen, but the reaction has an activation energy, meaning that it has to pass through a higher energy state in order to reach a lower energy state.
http://www.wwnorton.com/college/chemistry/gilbert/concepts/chapter14/ch14_5.htm
http://www.chem.wisc.edu/~newtrad/CurrRef/BDGTopic/BDGtext/BDGDmnd.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top