Carbon Attraction: Why Does Diamond Not Disappear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GAGS
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Carbon Oxygen
AI Thread Summary
Carbon atoms in diamond do not readily react with oxygen due to the stability of the carbon-carbon bonds within the diamond structure. While carbon does attract oxygen more than it attracts itself, the reaction requires a certain activation energy to overcome the stability of the diamond. High-velocity interactions with oxygen could potentially lead to combustion, but this is not a common occurrence under normal conditions. The discussion highlights that while diamonds can burn, they remain stable unless specific conditions are met. Thus, diamonds do not disappear because the energy barrier for combustion is not typically reached.
GAGS
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi all,sorry if i commit any mistake while asking this question.
Actually right now i am studying FEYNMAN lectures of physics vol.1.ON page 7 of chapter1 it is written and clearly understood that Carbon attracts Oxygen much more than carbon attracts carbon or oxygen atttracts oxygen.
But if its ok then question arises The diamond should get disappear as carbon atoms in it must interact with oxygen. Similar cases should be arises with other substances containing carbon?
I hope the question is clear to you.
Sorry ,if commited any mistake.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


He was talking about free atoms, not atoms already locked in a chemical bond.
 


But sir, then what will happen if oxygen atom approaches with high velocity?. (In short air may blow fast)??
 


According to this article, diamond can burn:
http://chemistry.about.com/cs/geochemistry/a/aa071801a.htm

Presumably this means that diamond would like to combine with oxygen, but the reaction has an activation energy, meaning that it has to pass through a higher energy state in order to reach a lower energy state.
http://www.wwnorton.com/college/chemistry/gilbert/concepts/chapter14/ch14_5.htm
http://www.chem.wisc.edu/~newtrad/CurrRef/BDGTopic/BDGtext/BDGDmnd.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top