Cassini confirms global ocean at Enceladus

  • Thread starter Thread starter mfb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Global Ocean
AI Thread Summary
NASA's recent findings confirm that Enceladus likely has a global subsurface ocean, supported by measurements of its gravitational field and surface rotation. The data suggests that the ice surface is not solidly connected to the core, indicating a liquid layer beneath. While this discovery adds to the understanding of Enceladus, it does not imply that the moon is a viable habitat for life or future human exploration due to the inaccessibility of the water beneath several kilometers of ice. The potential for a lander to melt through the ice for investigation exists, but concerns about contamination from Earth remain significant. Overall, while the discovery is intriguing, its practical implications for exploration are limited.
Messages
37,382
Reaction score
14,215
At least according to NASA's interpretation.

Both measurements of the gravitational field and of the rotation rate of the surface agree on that. If the surface is not connected to the core, its libration is stronger, and apparently the observed magnitude is not compatible with a solid connection between ice and core.

NASA press release

The research is presented in a paper published online this week in the journal Icarus.
I don't find it there yet, the press release doesn't give much detail.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
This corroborates upon previous evidence that this Moon probably has a liquid layer of it's interior and almost certainly it's water.
I don't think this makes it potentially viable as a habitat though, either for indigenous life or for possible future human habitation.
We can't investigate or make use of liquid water existing several kilometers beneath a solid ice surface, so while the discovery is interesting it's probably not of much consequence.
 
mfb said:
At least according to NASA's interpretation.

Both measurements of the gravitational field and of the rotation rate of the surface agree on that. If the surface is not connected to the core, its libration is stronger, and apparently the observed magnitude is not compatible with a solid connection between ice and core.

NASA press release

I don't find it there yet, the press release doesn't give much detail.

Nice result! Here are names of a couple of co-authors:
Matthew S. Tiscareno, Peter C. Thomas
We can search for the paper on arXiv later.
I did not see it when I looked just now.
 
Earlier Emily Lakdawalla posted a graphic showing which bodies might have subsurface oceans.
I see she included Enceladus.
oceans.png

Source:
http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/2015/03121716-ganymede-ocean.html

She reports here on evidence that the jovian moon Ganymede has a subsurface ocean. Among the sources she cites is this NASA release:
http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/archive/releases/2015/09/full/
 
Last edited:
rootone said:
This corroborates upon previous evidence that this Moon probably has a liquid layer of it's interior and almost certainly it's water.
I don't think this makes it potentially viable as a habitat though, either for indigenous life or for possible future human habitation.
We can't investigate or make use of liquid water existing several kilometers beneath a solid ice surface, so while the discovery is interesting it's probably not of much consequence.
There are ideas of a lander that would melt itself through the ice to investigate the ocean below. That concept is the usual way drilling happens in Antarctica today, Lake Vostok has been reached that way for example.
Complete sterilization of the probe would be a serious issue. We certainly don't want to introduce life from Earth, especially if there happens to be life (which is more likely for the larger moons I think, but we don't know).
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
Back
Top