Cauchy Product: Exponents or Counters Equal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter morenogabr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cauchy Product
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Cauchy product of two power series, specifically focusing on the conditions required for their respective terms of summation and exponents to align. Participants are exploring the implications of shifting indices and the necessary conditions for applying the Cauchy product theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the importance of having either the terms of summation or the exponents of the power series equal. There is uncertainty about whether both conditions must be satisfied for the Cauchy product theorem to apply.
  • One participant suggests making the summation powers of x equivalent and considers a variable change to address confusion with subscripts.
  • Another participant presents specific power series for f(x) and g(x) and raises questions about the starting indices of the summations when applying the theorem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning the setup of the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the alignment of summation powers and the use of variable changes, but no consensus has been reached on the necessary conditions for the Cauchy product.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of applying the Cauchy product theorem and are grappling with the implications of different starting indices for their series. There is a noted confusion regarding the appropriate limits for the summations involved.

morenogabr
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
When attemtpting to find the Cauchy product of two functs f(x) and g(x), which are themselves power series, is it more important to have their respective terms of summation be the same of for the exponent of their respective x variable to be equal? Or must both of these conditions be met? I am in a situation where it seems that shifting the index for f(x) to make x powers equal, makes the initial summation counters not equal. Not sure which of these conditions is needed to apply Cauchy prod theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why not show us what you are attempting, try click on the latex below to see the syntax
f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} a_n x^n

as a general rule I would try & make the summation powers of x equivalent. If the other subscripts are confusing why not try a variable change c_n = b_{n-2} etc.
 
<br /> f(x) = e^x = \\sum_{n=0}^{\\infty} (1/n!)(x^n),<br />
<br /> g(x) = sin(x) = \\sum_{k=0}^{\\infty} ((-1)^k)/(2k+1)! * x^(2k+1) <br />

latex not working? maybe its clear enoug what I am trying to show...

I need to use cauchy product theorem to obtain the first 3 terms of f(x)g(x).
So for g(x) I say m=2k+1, k=(m-1)/2, etc to achieve x^m but then the sum goes from m=1 to inf.
So if I leave x powers equal, the summations start at 0 for f(x) and 1 for g(x). But the theorem only gives
c_n=sum(from 0 to inf) a_(k) * b_(n-k) not sure if this would need to go from 1 to inf in my case or leave as 0?
 
morenogabr said:
<br /> f(x) = e^x = \\sum_{n=0}^{\\infty} (1/n!)(x^n),<br />
<br /> g(x) = sin(x) = \\sum_{k=0}^{\\infty} ((-1)^k)/(2k+1)! * x^(2k+1) <br />

latex not working? maybe its clear enoug what I am trying to show...

I need to use cauchy product theorem to obtain the first 3 terms of f(x)g(x).
So for g(x) I say m=2k+1, k=(m-1)/2, etc to achieve x^m but then the sum goes from m=1 to inf.
So if I leave x powers equal, the summations start at 0 for f(x) and 1 for g(x). But the theorem only gives
c_n=sum(from 0 to inf) a_(k) * b_(n-k) not sure if this would need to go from 1 to inf in my case or leave as 0?

<br /> f(x) = e^x = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^n}{n!}<br />
<br /> g(x) = sin(x) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1)^k x^{2k+1}}{(2k+1)!} <br />

Use this format for your latex, it's better.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K