Causality for internel vertex in Feynaman diagrams

In summary, the conversation discusses the interpretation of propagators in vacuum quantum field theory and whether causality implies a constraint on the time coordinates of internal vertex z. It is clarified that internal lines cannot be interpreted as particles and are simply mathematical notations. Only external legs can be interpreted as particles and the causality and Poincare invariance of the scheme is guaranteed through the microcausality property of field operators.
  • #1
dontknow
8
1
Eq 4.44 in Peskin and Schroeder. My question is:
Does causality imply that time coordinates of z (internal vertex over which we doing the integration) should lie between the time coordinates of field phi(x) and phi(y)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The propagators in vacuum QFT are the time-ordered propagators (which in the vacuum case are the same as the Feynman propagators). Thus there's no constraint on the times of the inner space-time point ##z##.
 
  • #3
sorry, I was not clear. we usually interpret propagators as particle popping out in space at some spacetime, let's suppose x and then it gets annihilated at spacetime point y. so if we follow the same interpretation here the particle which pops out at some point x can go back in time gets annihilated at z (internal vertex) and then come back to spacetime point y. while integrating this kind of propagation for all values of internal vertex, Does integration contribution comes from all points in spacetime or only those lying inside the cone (timelike) of spacetime?
Or maybe I am missing a point, does time-ordered product implies that we can go in only one direction of time?
Let me know if i am still not clear.
Thanks for answering.
 
  • #4
You cannot interpret the internal lines as particles. They are just clever mathematical notations to express the contributions of the perturbative series to the S-matrix element under consideration. Only the external legs stand for observable asymptotic free particle states, and only those are interpretable as particles. The causality and Poincare invariance of the scheme is guaranteed for such observable quantities through the microcausality property of the field operators.
 
  • Informative
Likes dontknow

1. What is causality in Feynman diagrams?

Causality in Feynman diagrams refers to the idea that the direction of time is represented by the direction of the arrows in the diagram. The arrows indicate the flow of particles and interactions between them, and they always point forward in time.

2. How is causality represented in Feynman diagrams?

Causality is represented in Feynman diagrams by the direction of the arrows, as well as the placement of the vertices. The vertices, where particles interact, are always placed in a way that preserves the direction of time.

3. What is an internal vertex in Feynman diagrams?

An internal vertex in Feynman diagrams is a point where particles interact without any external forces acting on them. This can be thought of as a virtual interaction, where the particles exchange energy and momentum, but do not actually exist as physical particles.

4. How does causality for internal vertices work in Feynman diagrams?

Causality for internal vertices in Feynman diagrams is maintained by the use of Feynman propagators. These propagators represent the probability amplitude for a particle to travel from one vertex to another, and they are always oriented in the direction of time.

5. Why is causality important in Feynman diagrams?

Causality is important in Feynman diagrams because it ensures that the calculations and predictions made using the diagrams are physically meaningful. By preserving the direction of time, causality ensures that the interactions between particles are consistent with our understanding of the laws of physics.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
472
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top