Cause of Exothermic Dissolution of Gases in Water

  • Thread starter Thread starter force
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Properties
AI Thread Summary
The dissolution of gases in water is typically exothermic because the separation of solute particles is not necessary for the process to occur. This means that less energy is required for the dissolution, as the gas can dissolve into existing spaces in the water. The discussion leans towards option a as the most accurate explanation, although there is some debate about the necessity of the second step in the solution-formation process. The overall consensus suggests that the energy dynamics favor exothermic reactions during gas dissolution. Understanding these principles is crucial for grasping the thermodynamics of gas solubility in liquids.
force
Solution Process

Who ever answers this is a genius.

The dissolution of gases in water is virtually always exothermic because __________.

a. one of the two endothermic steps (separation of solute particles) in the solution-formation process is unnecessary

b. the exothermic step in the solution-formation process is unnecessary

c. gases react exothermically with water

d. neither of the two endothermic steps in the solution-formation process is necessary

e. all three steps in the solution-formation process are exothermic
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
When dissolving a gas in a liquid, it is not necesary to expand the solute (the gas) in order to dissolve it, making the process need less input energy.
Also, at room temperature, water is already has a few "pockets" availible to dissolve a solute in, making it require even less energy.
 
in that case is d. correct ?
 
I am reluctant to say that the second step is entitely unnecesary, I think it is just not as necesary. I think I am leaning towards a. as the answer.
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top