Celestial Mass Accretion Spectrum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of creating a celestial mass accretion spectrum to categorize celestial objects based on mass, similar to the electromagnetic spectrum in physics. This spectrum would define the characteristics of various celestial bodies, such as planets and stars, and could illustrate their evolutionary paths over time. Participants express concerns about the complexity of incorporating extensive data into a single graph and the challenges in defining mass limits for different categories. The idea aims to enhance understanding in astronomy, akin to the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, but its feasibility remains debated. Overall, the proposal highlights the potential for a structured framework in classifying celestial objects.
Oriako
Messages
107
Reaction score
1
Hello,
Over the past few weeks I've been interested in the idea of developing a celestial mass accretion spectrum, or in other words, a spectrum that places celestial objects of a given mass as being part of a band of that spectrum. This spectrum would help give definitions on what a planet is, what a star is, etc. and I'm sure could be a noticeable and useful landmark for astronomy just as the electromagnetic spectrum is in physics. The spectrum could plot the size (diameter) as a function of a logarithmic mass scale from left to right. Evolutionary trails could also be made to illustrate the lives of these objects as some will increase/decrease in mass in a certain way throughout their lives. It could be similar in fashion to the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram, except more expansive in its explanatory reach.

-Asteroids-Rocky Planets-Gas Planets-Brown Dwarfs-White Dwarfs-Star-Neutron Star-Galaxy-Black Holes, etc.

And there could be a general range that each of these fit into and possibly a limit to each could be calculated one day, just as the Chandrasekhar limit was calculated.

Thoughts, Comments?
 
Last edited:
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Nice idea but I always thought that significant mass accretes only in say : black holes,WD interaction in type1a supernovae and as suggested in the Accretion induced collapse.

I am not that much of an expert ,going to start my undergraduate at the end of this year.Correct me if I am mistaken.
I personally think that there is too much of data to be incorporated into a lone graph.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top