Center of mass in Lagrangian mechanics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the motion of the center of mass within the framework of Lagrangian mechanics, paralleling the established proof in Newtonian mechanics. The Lagrangian for a system of N particles is presented, incorporating both kinetic and potential energy terms. Participants suggest using the Euler-Lagrange equations to derive equations of motion, while addressing concerns about the increase in degrees of freedom. The application of Noether's theorem is recommended to handle the broken symmetry due to external potentials. Ultimately, the motion of the center of mass can be derived, leading to the equation M dot{V} = -partial_X U_{ext}(X).
ralqs
Messages
97
Reaction score
1
We all know the proof, from Newtonian mechanics, that the motion of the center of mass of a system of particles can be found by treating the center of mass as a particle with all the external forces acting on it. I want to prove the same think, but within the framework of Lagrangian mechanics, and I',m having some trouble.

So to start, the Lagrangian of a system of N particles is
L=\sum_{i=1}^N \left(\frac{1}{2}m_i v_i^2 - U_{\mathrm{ext.}, i}(\vec{r}_i)\right) - U_{\mathrm{int.}}(\vec{r}_1, ..., \vec{r}_N).
U_{\mathrm{ext.},i} is the potential energy due to any external forces on the ith particle. With a little algebra, we can rewrite this as

L=\frac{1}{2}MV^2 - U_{\mathrm{ext.}} + \sum_{i=1}^N \frac{1}{2}m_i \tilde{v}_i^2 - U_{\mathrm{int.}}

where M=\sum m_i is the total mass, V is the speed of the center of mass, U_{\mathrm{ext.}} = \sum U_{\mathrm{ext.},i}, and \tilde{v}_i is the speed of the ith particle relative to the center of mass.

I don't know where to go from here. Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have the Lagrangian; what do you usually do with it? Invoke the Euler-Lagrange equations. With a set of generalized coordinates Q, \bar q_i, you should be ready to go.
 
I thought of that, but I had a problem: the number of degrees of freedom seems to go up, is that a problem?
 
I'd use Noether's theorem in extended form. You have a Lagrangian where explicit Galilean symmetry is broken by considering a part of the system described by an external potential. Otherwise the Lagrangian is invariant under Galileo boosts.

From the partial symmetry of the Lagrangian under Galileo boosts you should get the equation of motion for the center of mass

M \dot{V}=-\partial_X U_{\text{ext}}(X).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top