Centre of Mass - Centre of Charge?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of "centre of mass" and its potential analogous counterpart, "centre of charge," within the context of physics. Participants explore definitions, implications, and the relevance of these concepts in theoretical and practical applications, particularly in electromagnetism and mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines the centre of mass for a system of masses and questions the existence of a corresponding centre of charge for point charges.
  • Another participant discusses Coulomb's Law and its analogy to Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, emphasizing the law of superposition in the context of multiple point charges.
  • A participant expresses curiosity about the utility of an average position weighted by charge, noting that they have not encountered the term "centre of charge" in their studies.
  • One participant argues for the existence of a centre of charge, citing a textbook example where the net force on a charged particle outside a uniformly charged hollow sphere behaves as if it originates from a charge at the sphere's center.
  • Another participant suggests that while "centre of mass" is more commonly referenced, both concepts are useful in their respective contexts for simplifying problems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology and applicability of "centre of charge." While some argue for its existence and relevance, others question its common usage and practical implications. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the formal acceptance and utility of the term "centre of charge."

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the lack of consensus on the term "centre of charge" and its practical applications, as well as the dependence on specific contexts in which these concepts are utilized.

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
We define the position of the centre of mass of a system of ##n## masses as:

$$\vec{r_{cm}} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n m_i \vec{r_i}}{\sum_{i=1}^n m_i}$$

Why is there no such thing as "centre of charge", defined for ##n## point charges:

$$\vec{r_{cq}} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^n q_i \vec{r_i}}{\sum_{i=1}^n q_i}$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does Coulomb's Law do?
 
Doug Huffman said:
What does Coulomb's Law do?

It gives the magnitude and direction of the force between two point charges.
 
Hmm, I always thought it analogous to Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation.

All y'all's struggle with fancy notation/typography is moot without some small understanding of how things work, the theoretical minimum.

The law of superposition allows Coulomb's law to be extended to include any number of point charges. The force acting on a point charge due to a system of point charges is simply the vector addition of the individual forces acting alone on that point charge due to each one of the charges. The resulting force vector is parallel to the electric field vector at that point, with that point charge removed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law
I am a sustaining contributor to The Wikimedia Foundation, I hop that you also will.
 
Doug Huffman said:
Hmm, I always thought it analogous to Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation.

All y'all's struggle with fancy notation/typography is moot without some small understanding of how things work, the theoretical minimum.

I am a sustaining contributor to The Wikimedia Foundation, I hop that you also will.

I am familiar with superposition. What I meant to ask was whether the notion of an average position weighted by charge is of any use in physics, since I never came across the term "centre of charge".
 
Of course there is, even though the term "center of charge" is uncommonly used.

Coincidentally, I recently browsed through my new electromagnetism textbook and read something very interesting:

The net force on a charged particle outside of a charged hollow sphere with an equal charge distribution is

##\vec F = \frac{kQq}{\|r\| ^2} \hat r ## ##\\\ \text{if}\ \ r>R##

Q is the net charge of the sphere,
q is the charge of the particle located outside of the sphere,
k is Coulomb's constant,
||r|| is the distance between the particle and the center of the sphere, and
R is the radius of the sphere.

One can see that as long as the particle is outside the sphere, the force from the sphere applied on the particle will act as though the force came from a particle, with net charge Q, located at the center of the sphere. This realization implies the practicality of the idea of "center of charge" without specifically stating such a phrase.
 
Joshua L said:
Of course there is, even though the term "center of charge" is uncommonly used.

Coincidentally, I recently browsed through my new electromagnetism textbook and read something very interesting:

The net force on a charged particle outside of a charged hollow sphere with an equal charge distribution is

##\vec F = \frac{kQq}{\|r\| ^2} \hat r ## ##\\\ \text{if}\ \ r>R##

Q is the net charge of the sphere,
q is the charge of the particle located outside of the sphere,
k is Coulomb's constant,
||r|| is the distance between the particle and the center of the sphere, and
R is the radius of the sphere.

One can see that as long as the particle is outside the sphere, the force from the sphere applied on the particle will act as though the force came from a particle, with net charge Q, located at the center of the sphere. This realization implies the practicality of the idea of "center of charge" without specifically stating such a phrase.

Then perhaps the "centre of mass" is more common than the "centre of charge" since mass appears in both Newton's Second Law and Newton's Law of Gravitation, right?
 
It is fair to say the the practical implications of "center of mass" are far more exploited than that of the "center of charge". However, both are quite useful in their contexts; they each make problems generally easier and, for some, even possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
481
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
513
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K