Centre of mass energy in the p+p collision

Wenchao.Zhang
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, experts
I got a very naive question.
I read the following sentence in a paper: "New results on the production of charged pions in p+p interactions are presented. The data come from a sample of 4.8 million inelastic events obtained with the NA49 detector at the CERN SPS at 158 GeV/c beam momentum". (see the abstract of DOI:10.1140/epjc/s2005-02391-9)
Then it says that the the centre of mass energy is 17.3 GeV. It is really hard for me to get this conclusion. Could sb. gives me some hint?
Best wishes
W.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a collision between two particles of equal mass M, the relationship is s = Ecm2 = 2M2 + 2M Elab where s is the usual Lorentz invariant.

So M = 1 GeV and Elab = 158 GeV gives you Ecm = √318 = 17.8 GeV
 
That's a beam target collision I suppose. Try using 4-vectos. I get the formula E_{CM}=\sqrt{2m(E_L+m)}, where ECM is the center of mass energy, EL is the Energy of the incoming proton in the LAB reference frame, and m is the mass of the proton.
 
dauto said:
That's a beam target collision I suppose. Try using 4-vectos. I get the formula E_{CM}=\sqrt{2m(E_L+m)}, where ECM is the center of mass energy, EL is the Energy of the incoming proton in the LAB reference frame, and m is the mass of the proton.
I couldn't have said it better myself. :wink:
 
Thanks for the replies. I think I got the answer. Say the four vector of the incoming proton in the lab frame is p1=(E_lab,0,0, p_z), the four vector for the rest proton is p2=(M,0,0,0), then s should be equal to (E_lab+M)^2-(p_z)^2=2M^2+2E_lab*M. Thanks a lot.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top