Centrifugal Acceleration GR: Formula for .8c, 1m Radius

grav-universe
Messages
460
Reaction score
1
I swing an accelerometer around my head with a constant relative speed of v and a radius of r. I want the exact formula with highly relativistic effects, so v = .8 c and r = 1 meter, say. What proper acceleration will the accelerometer read?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take a look at the Wikipedia page on Born coordinates:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_coordinates

They give a formula for the proper acceleration of a "Langevin observer", which corresponds to the accelerometer being swung around your head. They give it in terms of the angular velocity \omega, but using the formula v = \omega r, it is easy to come up with a formula in terms of the velocity v:

a = \frac{- v^2}{r \left( 1 - v^2 \right)}

This makes sense; it's just the standard Newtonian formula for centripetal acceleration, with an extra relativistic factor of \gamma^2.
 
Thank you PeterDonis.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Back
Top