Centripedal & Centrifugal force

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal force is a real force acting on an object in circular motion, requiring an agent to exert it, while centrifugal force is perceived in a rotating non-inertial frame and is considered a fictitious or inertial force. The distinction lies in the reference frame: centripetal force is analyzed from an inertial frame, whereas centrifugal force arises when observing from a rotating frame. Although centrifugal force is termed "fictitious," it results from the effects of acceleration in non-inertial frames. The discussion emphasizes that all nonzero acceleration implies the presence of a corresponding force, regardless of the frame of reference. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing motion in different contexts.
madking153
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
hi,
what is difference between Centripedal & Centrifugal ? One is in inertial frames and the other in rotating frames? one is 'true' force and the other is fictitious force?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.It's "centripetal", not "centripedal".

2. Changing reference frames from inertial to noninertial frames usually involves the appearance of effects such as centrifugal forces, Coriolis forces.

There are no such things as "fictitious forces". Any nonzero acceleration is a frame of reference means a nonzero force is present.

Daniel.
 
When viewing circular motion from an inertial frame, one finds a centripetal force producing the acceleration. Centripetal force is a "real" force, since it requires a real agent (something that exerts the force).

Viewed from the rotating non-inertial frame, Newton's laws must be modified by the additional of "fictious" (better called "inertial") forces like centrifugal force. Centrifugal force is "fictitious" in the sense that it is entirely due to viewing things from a noninertial frame; there is no agent exerting the centrifugal force. But the effect is very real.
 
yes, centrifugal forces and coriolis forces are called Fictitious force..
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top