Centripetal Acceleration increases with greater radius?

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal acceleration is debated in relation to radius, with the formula a = v^2/R suggesting it does not increase with a greater radius. However, the equation a = (omega)^2R indicates that it can increase with radius under certain conditions. The discussion highlights that as radius increases, speed may also increase, affecting centripetal acceleration. It is noted that the two expressions for centripetal acceleration are equivalent when considering the relationship v = r omega. Ultimately, centripetal acceleration does not inherently increase with radius without accounting for changes in speed.
eurekameh
Messages
209
Reaction score
0
Does centripetal acceleration increase with a greater radius?
According to a = v^2/R, it does not.
According to a = (omega)^2R, it does.
So which is it?
I think that as you go further out to a greater radius, speed also increases, and so a = v^2/R would also make sense in terms of a greater centripetal acceleration with a greater radius.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Careful—you forgot that v=r \omega. Your two expressions are equivalent.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top