Centripetal Acceleration of North Pole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the centripetal acceleration at the equator and the North Pole due to Earth's rotation. Participants highlight the need to relate centripetal acceleration to angular speed, emphasizing the formula a = V^2 / r. The conversation also touches on the relationship between angular velocity and tangential velocity, indicating that angular velocity can be derived from the Earth's rotation period. Ultimately, the key to solving the problem lies in understanding these relationships and the angular velocity of the Earth's rotation.
lacar213
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider the radius of the Earth to be 6.38×106 m. What is the magnitude of the centripetal acceleration experienced by a person (a) at the equator and (b) at the North Pole due to the Earth's rotation?


Homework Equations


a = V^2 / r


The Attempt at a Solution


I drew a diagram of what the problem describes but how do you get the acceleration without knowing the velocity?? Would it have something to do with angular speed??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lacar213 said:
Would it have something to do with angular speed??
Exactly. You can express the centripetal acceleration in terms of angular speed. (How does angular speed relate to velocity for circular motion?)
 
angular = radians / s
 
Wouldnt you need to know the time for angular velocity?
 
lacar213 said:
angular = radians / s
Radians/sec are certainly the units for angular velocity, but I was thinking of the relationship between angular velocity and tangential velocity. Read this: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/HBASE/rotq.html#avel"

lacar213 said:
Wouldnt you need to know the time for angular velocity?
What's the angular velocity of the Earth's rotation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top