Centripetal Acceleration Part II

AI Thread Summary
To find the time required for a satellite to complete one orbit at a radius of 6689 km and speed of 7723.55 m/s, the correct formula to use is v = 2πr/T. After substituting the values, the calculation yields T = 5221.57 seconds. This converts to approximately 1.51 hours. The discussion highlights the importance of using the correct radius in calculations and emphasizes the need for unit conversion.
BitterSuites
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Centripetal Acceleration Part II

Homework Statement



(From previous question) In order for a satellite to move in a stable circular orbit of radius 6689 km at a constant speed, its centripetal acceleration must be inversely proportional to the square of the radius of the orbit.

What is the speed of the satellite? The G is 6.67259e-11 and the mass of the Earth is 5.98e24kg.

The answer to this was 7723.55 m/s.

Part II:

Find the time required to complete one orbit. Answer in units of h.

Homework Equations



The book only gives one equation for T referencing orbits, which is v=2pir/T

The Attempt at a Solution



v=2pi/T
7723.55 = 2pi/T
7723.55T = 2pi
T = 2pi/7723.55
T = .000814

I think the homework system even laughed at me when I entered that answer :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
BitterSuites said:

Homework Equations



The book only gives one equation for T referencing orbits, which is v=2pir/T
Right.

The Attempt at a Solution



v=2pi/T
Wrong.

Compare the two equations. (You left off the r.)

And don't forget to convert your answer to the desired units.
 
*sigh* I keep making really silly mistakes.

So I input the correct equation but it came out correct.

v=2pir/t
7723.55 m/s = 2pi * 6689000m/T
7723.55T = 4.20282e7
T = 5221.57 seconds

Convert to hours

5221.57/60 = 90.6928 minutes
90.6928/60 = 1.51155 hours

Thank you so much.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top