'Centripetal Accelerations' and 'Radius of Curvatures' in Projectile Motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving two problems related to centripetal acceleration and radius of curvature in projectile motion. The first problem involves calculating the radius of curvature at the highest point of the projectile's path, which was successfully solved using the velocity at that point. The second problem is more complex, requiring the determination of the particle's velocity when it makes an angle of ѳ/2 with the horizontal. Participants suggest using trigonometric identities to find the vertical component of velocity and clarify that the centripetal force should only consider the component of gravity perpendicular to the velocity. The final guidance emphasizes correcting the approach to find the correct radius of curvature using the derived velocity.
modulus
Messages
127
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


The first question:
‘A particle is projected with a speed u at an angle ѳ with the horizontal. Consider a small part of it’s path near the highest position and take it approximately to be a circular arc. What is the radius of this circle? This radius is called the radius of curvature of the curve at that point.’

The second question:
‘What is the radius of curvature of a parabola traced out by the projectile in the previous problem at a point where the particle velocity makes an angle ѳ/2 with the horizontal?’




Homework Equations


For first situation: mg = mv2/r
v (at that point) = u cos ѳ

For the second situation: mg cos(ѳ/2) = mv’2/r
v’ = vx + vy
vx = u cos ѳ




The Attempt at a Solution


The first problem was easy to solve, because we could consider the velocity of the particle at the highest point, which was only u cos ѳ (as the vertical compnent was equal to zero) as v, and, solve using the formula for centripeal acceleration. My answer was: u2cos2 ѳ/g

But, I’m having trouble with the second problem. How can Ifigure out the velocity of the particle at the position mentioned? I can’t figure out the vertical component at that point. Is there any formula or figuring out the velocity of a projrctile according to the angle it makes with the horizontal? Could you please help me solve this problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You've got the initial vx from the set up. Assuming we are neglecting air resistance the initial vx is the vx through the entire problem. So when the velocity makes an angle of ѳ/2 with the horizontal you have two parts of the puzzle. You have the horizontal component and the angle that makes with the hypotenuse of the triangle formed from vx, vy, and v’. From there it's a matter of trig. Might I suggest the use of tangent of the angle with the horizontal to find the vertical component or to go directly to v’ the cos of the angle with respect to the horizontal?

You'll want to be careful with your centripetal force as well. It won't be all of mg. It will be just the part of mg perpendicular to v’.
 
Last edited:
Right!

I figured out the component of vx in the direction of the projectile's velocity. That would be equal to u cosѳ*cos(ѳ/2). But the answer is given only in terms of cos(ѳ/2).

Any trig identity to apply? (Sorry, my trig's really weak).
 
  • Like
Likes Himanshu Bharti
Never mind, there is a cos(theta) in the answer given in the book.
 
You'll want to be careful with your centripetal force as well. It won't be all of mg. It will be just the part of mg perpendicular to v’.

So mg cos(ѳ/2) = mv'2/r is not correct?

Anyways, I solved assuming the above statement is correct and using what you told me, but the given answer was different again.

My answer: u2 cos2ѳ cos(ѳ/2)/g

Book's answer: u2cos2ѳ/g cos3(ѳ/2)


Did I do something wrong again?
Please help.
 
So mg cos(ѳ/2) = mv'2/r is not correct?

That is correct.

u cosѳ*cos(ѳ/2)

This you messed up a little.

cos(ѳ/2) = u*cos(ѳ)/v' because cos of the angle is adjacent over hypotenuse

So:

v' = u*cos(ѳ)/cos(ѳ/2)

Now plug that into mg cos(ѳ/2) = mv'2/r and solve for r and you should get your answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top