Centripetal Force (Horizontally Banked Question)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of friction required for a car to navigate a banked curve without skidding at higher speeds. Initially, the calculations for the angle of the banked curve were based on a speed of 60 km/h, resulting in an angle of approximately 28.16 degrees. When recalculating for a speed of 90 km/h, discrepancies arose in the coefficient of friction, with one participant arriving at 0.67 instead of the expected 0.39. Further analysis indicated that the correct approach should involve using the tangent of the angle rather than sine, leading to a revised angle of about 25.24 degrees and a coefficient of friction of 0.59. The importance of accurately accounting for the increased reaction force at higher speeds was emphasized, suggesting that a free body diagram could clarify the forces involved.
McKeavey
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If a curve with a radius of 60m is properly banked for a car traveling at 60km/h (16.66m/s) with no friction, what must be the coefficient of friction if the car is not to skid when traveling at 90km/h (25m/s)


Homework Equations


mac = mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is 0.39

First we need to find the angle, so since it said that when the speed was 60km/h, there is No friction, we can make this equation.. and do the following calculations
Fgx = mac
mgsinɵ = mv^2/r
gsinɵ = v^2/r
9.8sinɵ = 16.66^2/60
sinɵ = 4.625/9.8
ɵ = 28.16

So now we have the angle..
We can now use the speed 90km/h with our new angle.
So the new equation is..
Ff + Fgx = mv^2/r
μFn + Fgx = mv^2/r
μmgcos28 + mgsin28 = mv^2/r
μ9.8cos28 + 9.8sin28 = (25)^2/60
μ(8.65) + 4.6 = 10.41
μ = 10.41 - 4.6/8.65
μ = 0.67

So I'm not sure where I went wrong..
the answer is 0.39 :O
 
Physics news on Phys.org
McKeavey said:

Homework Statement


If a curve with a radius of 60m is properly banked for a car traveling at 60km/h (16.66m/s) with no friction, what must be the coefficient of friction if the car is not to skid when traveling at 90km/h (25m/s)


Homework Equations


mac = mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


The answer is 0.39

First we need to find the angle, so since it said that when the speed was 60km/h, there is No friction, we can make this equation.. and do the following calculations
Fgx = mac
mgsinɵ = mv^2/r
gsinɵ = v^2/r
9.8sinɵ = 16.66^2/60
sinɵ = 4.625/9.8
ɵ = 28.16

So now we have the angle..
We can now use the speed 90km/h with our new angle.
So the new equation is..
Ff + Fgx = mv^2/r
μFn + Fgx = mv^2/r
μmgcos28 + mgsin28 = mv^2/r
μ9.8cos28 + 9.8sin28 = (25)^2/60
μ(8.65) + 4.6 = 10.41
μ = 10.41 - 4.6/8.65
μ = 0.67

So I'm not sure where I went wrong..
the answer is 0.39 :O

You will be familiar with the idea that when you drive through a dip in the road, you feel heavier. This is because when you move through the dip, the reaction force is larger than just mg.
A similar thing happens when you drive round a banked turn. The reaction force is stronger than when the vehicle is parked on the banked turn.
The net result is that your second line : mgsinɵ = mv2/r
should actually have been : mgtanɵ = mv2/r
 
Hmm I got angle as 25.24.
And then the resulting coefficient of friction as 0.59 :S

By the way thanks for the other thread, I got the right answer for it ^^
Now..To finish this.. :(
 
McKeavey said:
Hmm I got angle as 25.24.
And then the resulting coefficient of friction as 0.59 :S

By the way thanks for the other thread, I got the right answer for it ^^
Now..To finish this.. :(

By rounding off your 60 kph conversion you get angle 25.24. I didn't round, and got 25.28657. Only a slight difference, but it may make a difference.

I hope you took into account the fact that at 90 kph, the Reaction force is even greater than it is at 60 kph.

Draw a free body diagram and you will [hopefully] see how much bigger.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top