Centripetal force in London Eye

AI Thread Summary
Centripetal force in the London Eye is primarily generated by the friction between the seat and the person, as well as the push from the capsule wall on the person. The tension in the cable does not directly contribute to the centripetal force acting on an individual since it is not connected to them. At the top of the wheel, gravity plays a significant role, with a person's weight contributing to the centripetal force. Different points along the circular path involve various combinations of forces to maintain the centripetal motion. Understanding these forces is crucial for analyzing the dynamics of the ride.
Masafi
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
The centripetal force is caused by: Friction between seat & person or push of capsule wall on person.

How come the answer is not the Tension in the cable?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The cable is not directly connected to the person and so can't be causing the centripetal force on the person.
At the top of the wheel, for example, the centripetal force on a person is caused by gravity; i.e. their weight. At different points on the circle, the centripetal force will be caused by different combinations of a number of forces.
Can you be more specific with what the question is asking for?
 
Stonebridge said:
The cable is not directly connected to the person and so can't be causing the centripetal force on the person.
At the top of the wheel, for example, the centripetal force on a person is caused by gravity; i.e. their weight. At different points on the circle, the centripetal force will be caused by different combinations of a number of forces.
Can you be more specific with what the question is asking for?

Just to state what causes the force "R" , which is an arrow pointing towards the centre.

Thanks for the reply
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top