Centripetal force on a curved bridge

AI Thread Summary
When a car speeds over a curved bridge, it can lose contact with the ground due to centripetal force dynamics. The equation presented, S - mg = Mv²/r, raises confusion as S represents the normal force, which becomes zero when the car leaves the road. The weight of the car (mg) acts as the centripetal force in this scenario, suggesting that the correct equation should be mg = mv²/r at the point of losing contact. The discussion emphasizes that the normal force is not relevant when the car is airborne, confirming that only weight contributes to centripetal force in this situation. Understanding these forces is crucial for analyzing motion on curved surfaces.
aurao2003
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



When a car is speeding over a curved surface e.g a bridge, it sometimes loses contact with the ground. We have seen this many times in high speed chases and rally driving.

In this scenario, the textbook wrote this equation:
S-mg =Mv^2/r
The RHS side is obviously the equation for centripeta force (F=Mv^2/r).
But why is the resultant force S-mg since S=0? I thought the only relevant force should be the weight which acts downwards thereby forcing the car back on to the road. Also in the context of the centripetal force, is it not the weight that acts as the centripetal force in this case. Therefore I was thinking the equation should be
mg =mv^2/r.



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is S the upward force of the road on the car?
If so, the equation should be mg-S=mv²/r
S will be equal to zero just at the point where the car leaves the road. Then, as you rightly say, the centripetal force is provided purely by the car's weight mg.
I agree the equation you quoted doesn't make sense.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top