Centripetal force ( Swinging a bucket in a vertical motion )

AI Thread Summary
When a bucket filled with water is swung in a vertical circle, the dynamics change significantly at the top of the circle due to the interplay of centripetal force and gravity. At this point, gravity acts downward, but the water must also experience a force pushing it toward the center to prevent it from falling out. If the angular velocity increases, the required centripetal force becomes greater, and the water remains in the bucket as long as this force exceeds the gravitational pull. The concept of perceived gravity suggests that at the top, the water feels a force acting upward relative to its motion, which can lead to confusion about the source of the reaction force. Ultimately, for the water to stay in the bucket, the centripetal force must equal or exceed the weight of the water, preventing spillage.
Victorian91
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
First of all,
the situation is as follows :
A girl is swinging a bucket filled with water, and she is whirling it around in a vertical motion.
When the bucket is at any other position on the circumference of the circle, everything seems fine and intuitive.

But an interesting thing happens when the bucket is at the top of the circle.
Newton's Third Law implies an equal an opposite reaction due a push or pull.
At the top, force due to gravity is pointing downwards.
But what then causes the Reaction force?
Since nothing is pushing it, where is the cause of it?

It makes me wonder, if we then increased the angular velocity of the bucket,
I understand that we need an extra force towards the center of the circle in order to compensate for the extra centripetal force. So the reaction on the water due to the bucket becomes larger.

What if i tried to explain this using perceived gravity.
So at the top of the circle, the water perceived gravity as pointing upwards, hence the water will ' BELIEVE ' that the gravity is pointing downwards relative to it and hence will not fall. If that is the case, then it only makes perfect sense to me that the reaction force, now is due to the perceived gravity.
But is perceived gravity a force, or just what we actually perceive?

So, to sum everything up, I am confuse about this problem, Can somebody explain what causes the reaction force on the water due to the bucket?
Many thanks in advance...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mg = mv^2(at the highest point of the vertical circle)/r
here,
mg = weight of water in the bucket
when mg > mv^2/r, then a part of water shall provide the necessary centripetal force; n the rest of the weight of water [mg-mv^2/r] causes some water to accelerate downwards and spill...this is the case when the bucket is whirled slowly
when the whirling velo is greater then,
mv^2/r>mg, so all the weight of water prvides centripetal force n the water in the bucket does not spill.


hope m able to make it clear to u!
 
No object wants to move in a circle. It goes in a straight line or is stationary unless some force is acting on it.
So in order to move in a circle you must push constantly in direction of the center of the circle to keep it in that motion otherwise the object will continue in a straight line.
So it the bucket, the water is trying to go in a straight line all the time with the speed you are giving to it, but there is the bottom of the bucket preventing that by applying force to the water.
So in weightlessness no matter the angular velocity it will stay in the bucket.
On earth, on the top of the motion, it must create bigger force than the gravity (or equal but then the water will "feel" weightless) or otherwise it will spill.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top