Centripetal Force vs Radius: Exploring Uniform Acceleration Lab Results

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
12 replies · 6K views
BlueCardBird
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
During a lab, we had to plot graph between Centripetal Force vs Radius of rubber stopper (some uniform acceleration lab) the result i got was a horizontal line. Then a question asks Based on your graph of centripetal force vs. radius of rubber stopper's motion, can you conclude that centripetal force is directly proportional to the radius of the rubber stoppers motion? Explain your answer. I'm just wondering if my answer makes sense.

Based on our graph, it states that the theoretical centripetal force is not proportional to the radius of the rubber stoppers motion. Since Fc=m.a and a=4π²r/T² then Fc=m (4π²r/T²), basically we are only graphing the Fc’s relationship to r. This statement can only be held true if the mass is constant, and T is constant. In this case, though m stays constant, T does not, and that is why the graph does not display a direct proportionality between Fc and r.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What were the axes of the graph and what variables did you keep constant? What were the details of the experiment. You haven't told us enough to be able to help you yet. This is a Physics Forum, not a Psychic one. :biggrin:
 
The T is dependent upon the mass at the bottom, in our case we used washers, Fg=Ft=Fc
 
the vertical axis was the Centripetal Force and Horizontal axis was the Radius
 
This does not compute for me. The centripetal force is the same as the tension in the string - which is the weight hanging on the bottom. You said that varies - so how do you get a horizontal line if the y co-ordinates (i.e. weights hanging on the string) are not all the same?
 
the y values are the same, it is that radius that is changing
 
no, what I'm saying is that Tension is the same but the radius is changing; also period is changing aswell.
 
Of course you can arrange for many combinations of radius and speed which will give the same tension. The instructions you quoted included varying the tension. It would have helped if you had bothered to describe your particular experiment instead of leaving us to read that doc (as I asked at the start).
 
Last edited:
The formula for the tension in the string is
T = mv2/r

If you are keeping T constant, shouldn't you be plotting r against v, rather than r against T, which you are keeping constant by adjusting v?

To yield a useful result, an experiment needs to reveal the relationship between two variables whilst all others are kept constant. Isn't that the basis of the scientific approach?