Certain isotope tell you that the decay rate decreases

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the decay rate of a certain isotope, specifically how it decreases from 8337 decays/minute to 3174 decays/minute over a period of 5 days. Participants are examining the implications of their calculations related to the decay constant and half-life.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the conversion of units and the calculation of the decay constant (lambda). There is confusion regarding the sign of lambda, with some questioning whether it should be negative and how that affects the half-life calculation.

Discussion Status

Some participants are exploring different interpretations of the decay equation and the implications of their calculations. There is acknowledgment of potential errors in the assumptions about initial and final activity levels, and guidance is being offered regarding unit consistency.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can use or the methods they can apply. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the correct interpretation of decay rates and their mathematical representation.

xinlan
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Measurements of a certain isotope tell you that the decay rate decreases from 8337 decays/minute to 3174 decays/minute over a period of 5.00 days.

Homework Equations



R=Ro.e^-lamda/t
then T1/2 = ln(2)/lamda

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted all the units..
t = 5 days = 432000 seconds
R = 8337 decays/minute = 52.9 decays/s
Ro=3174 decays/minute = 138.95 decays/s
I did:
R=Ro.e^-lamda/t
52.9=138.95 . e^-lamda*432000
lamda = -1.86*10^-6

I am confused.. the lamda should not be a negative number right?

because half-life should be a positive number..
please help me..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if one take R0 to be the lesser activity and the later activity to be greater, then one will get a negative lamdba since the activity is increasing.

Usually R(t) < R0, i.e. R(t) is decreasing from R0.


If one takes the ln of the decay equation, one can make it linear.

Start with R0 = 8337 decays/minute, then R(t=5days) = 3174 decays/minute, but make sure units/time are on the same basis.
 
I should convert all the units right?

then if the lamda is negative, the half-life will be negative, and should I just plug in the minus sign as well on the computer?
 
I got it.. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K