Certain isotope tell you that the decay rate decreases

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the decay rate of a specific isotope, which decreases from 8337 decays/minute to 3174 decays/minute over 5 days. The decay constant (lambda) was calculated as -1.86 x 10^-6, leading to confusion regarding its negative value. Participants clarified that if the initial activity (R0) is greater than the later activity (R), the lambda value will be negative, indicating an increase in activity rather than decay. The correct interpretation is that R(t) should be less than R0, confirming the expected decay behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay equations, specifically R=Ro.e^-lambda/t
  • Familiarity with half-life calculations, including T1/2 = ln(2)/lambda
  • Basic unit conversion skills, particularly between decays/minute and decays/second
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their application in decay equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the decay constant in radioactive decay
  • Learn about the implications of negative decay constants in isotopic studies
  • Explore unit conversion techniques for time and decay rates in physics
  • Investigate the graphical representation of decay processes using logarithmic plots
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or chemistry, educators teaching radioactive decay concepts, and researchers analyzing isotopic decay rates will benefit from this discussion.

xinlan
Messages
61
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Measurements of a certain isotope tell you that the decay rate decreases from 8337 decays/minute to 3174 decays/minute over a period of 5.00 days.

Homework Equations



R=Ro.e^-lamda/t
then T1/2 = ln(2)/lamda

The Attempt at a Solution


I converted all the units..
t = 5 days = 432000 seconds
R = 8337 decays/minute = 52.9 decays/s
Ro=3174 decays/minute = 138.95 decays/s
I did:
R=Ro.e^-lamda/t
52.9=138.95 . e^-lamda*432000
lamda = -1.86*10^-6

I am confused.. the lamda should not be a negative number right?

because half-life should be a positive number..
please help me..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, if one take R0 to be the lesser activity and the later activity to be greater, then one will get a negative lamdba since the activity is increasing.

Usually R(t) < R0, i.e. R(t) is decreasing from R0.


If one takes the ln of the decay equation, one can make it linear.

Start with R0 = 8337 decays/minute, then R(t=5days) = 3174 decays/minute, but make sure units/time are on the same basis.
 
I should convert all the units right?

then if the lamda is negative, the half-life will be negative, and should I just plug in the minus sign as well on the computer?
 
I got it.. :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K