I Chandrasekhar Mass and the Relativistic Star: Finding the Value of K for n=3

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Apashanka das
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the value of K for a relativistic star with a polytropic index of n=3, as expressed in the mass-radius relation. Participants clarify that K is the constant connecting pressure and density, while M3 refers to the mass of the star. There is a request for resources to find the specific value of K, with a suggestion to refer to the Wikipedia page on the Chandrasekhar limit for further information. Consistency in notation is emphasized, particularly between k and K, as well as the use of M3. The conversation highlights the need for algebraic manipulation to relate K to standard notations.
Apashanka das
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
From the mass radius relation I have gone through mass of a relativistic star ( polytrophic index 3) which is
4piM3(K/piG)3/2
can anyone please suggest me any information of where the value of k is determined for relativistic star( for n=3) via any link
Where k is constt
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Apashanka das said:
From the mass radius relation I have gone through mass of a relativistic star ( polytrophic index 3) which is
4piM3(K/piG)3/2
can anyone please suggest me any information of where the value of k is determined for relativistic star( for n=3) via any link
Where k is constt
Please clarify your symbols. What is n -- is it the polytropic index? What is k -- is it the same as K? M3 must be a mass -- but the mass of what? (What does the subscript 3 signify?)
 
JMz said:
Please clarify your symbols. What is n -- is it the polytropic index? What is k -- is it the same as K? M3 must be a mass -- but the mass of what? (What does the subscript 3 signify?)
yes all the standard notations
n is polytrophic index
k is the constt connecting pressure and density
M3 is the mass of a star for p
JMz said:
Please clarify your symbols. What is n -- is it the polytropic index? What is k -- is it the same as K? M3 must be a mass -- but the mass of what? (What does the subscript 3 signify?)
yes standard notations from the book dina prialnik
Screenshot_20180307-125551.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20180307-125551.jpg
    Screenshot_20180307-125551.jpg
    25.8 KB · Views: 481
You must be more consistent in your notation: k and K are two different symbols. Also, M3 is not a standard symbol in physics, it is apparently one that this specific author chose.

To answer your question: I suggest you start with WP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_limit, which should enable you to determine the origin of the author's K.
 
JMz said:
You must be more consistent in your notation: k and K are two different symbols. Also, M3 is not a standard symbol in physics, it is apparently one that this specific author chose.

To answer your question: I suggest you start with WP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_limit, which should enable you to determine the origin of the author's K.
actually K is the connection coefficient between pressure and density
Hence I am looking for the K for polytrophic index 3 ,that's only I want where
P=Kρ(n+1)/n
where n is the polytrophic index
P is the pressure
And ρ is the density of the star
 
I believe requires only a little algebra to relate your K to Wikipedia's notation.
 
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Asteroid, Data - 1.2% risk of an impact on December 22, 2032. The estimated diameter is 55 m and an impact would likely release an energy of 8 megatons of TNT equivalent, although these numbers have a large uncertainty - it could also be 1 or 100 megatons. Currently the object has level 3 on the Torino scale, the second-highest ever (after Apophis) and only the third object to exceed level 1. Most likely it will miss, and if it hits then most likely it'll hit an ocean and be harmless, but...
Back
Top