Chain rule proof help me dunno what's wrong

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the proof of the chain rule in calculus, specifically addressing the limits involved in the expressions lim(x->a) g(x) and lim(x->a) f(a). The user initially struggled with understanding why these limits equate to g(x) and f(x) respectively. The resolution lies in recognizing that lim(x->a) g(x) equals g(a) if g is continuous at a, which the user confirmed. The chain rule is also correctly stated as d/dx (f*g) = df/dx * g + dg/dx * f.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of continuity and differentiability of functions
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in differentiation
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of continuity and its implications in calculus
  • Review the formal definition of limits and their properties
  • Practice problems involving the chain rule and limits
  • Explore the relationship between differentiability and continuity
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those struggling with the concepts of limits, continuity, and the chain rule in differentiation.

Andrax
Messages
117
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


this is kinda funny I've been strugglnig with the proof for 3 hours straight today
long story short(<--sorry couldn't find the best way t o say this ) i made it to this statement
lim(x->a) g(x) if this is equal to g(x) then my proof is done
lim(x->a) f(a) if this is equal to f(x) then my proof is done
what's on my mind : this is obviously NOT correct ,after 3 hours of pain i decided to check the txtbook found everything that I've doneto this part and they just write
lim(x->a) g(x)=g(x) and lim(x->a) f(a)=f(x) vthis made me pretty mad i have no idea how they've done this , i was good at limits i have no idea how is this correct if someone can help explain it to me please

forgot to metion i don't think this is important though they use h instead of x-a
chain rule = d/dx (f*g) = df/dxf*g+dg/dxg*f

Homework Equations


without reading the above why lim(x->a) g(x)=g(x)
and why lim(x->a) f(a)=f(x)

The Attempt at a Solution


what I've said up
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
##\lim_{x\to a}g(x)## is not equal to g(x). Note that this wouldn't even make sense, since x is a dummy variable in ##\lim_{x\to a}g(x)##. This expression means the same thing as ##\lim_{t\to a}g(t)##. It's equal to g(a) if and only if g is continuous at a. (Note that if g is differentiable at a, it is also continuous at a).
 
Oh i totally missed this part g is actually continuous at a thanks
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K