B Challenge to humanity to see beyond and further than the CMS

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the limitations of observing the universe beyond the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), which marks a significant point in cosmic evolution. While electromagnetic radiation cannot penetrate further back, alternatives like gravitational wave astronomy and neutrino astronomy offer potential insights into earlier cosmic events. The universe was approximately 300,000 years old at the CMB's formation, with the Cosmic Neutrino Background originating just 2 seconds after the Big Bang. Additionally, primordial gravitational waves could provide information from as early as 10^-36 seconds. The conversation concludes that while common beliefs suggest a barrier at the CMB, other data sources exist for exploring earlier cosmic history.
Elbert Anstein
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The CMS or cosmological background permates the whole universe. It's mentioned so often in study halls and on documentaries that NOTHING can peak further back into the universe evolution beyond the CMS.

Just want to hear all of your ideas on how YOU would solve this problem if you were on this project.
 
Space news on Phys.org
It's not a technical issue, it's a feature of the universe. Light could not penetrate the universe before the instant that the CMB.

There are two known ways to look further back: gravitational wave astronomy, and neutrino astronomy. Both are in their infancy.

The universe was about 300,000 years old when the CMB was produced.
The Cosmic Neutrino Background was made when the universe was about 2 seconds old.
Primordial gravity waves would date to about 10^-36 seconds
 
Elbert Anstein said:
It's mentioned so often in study halls and on documentaries that NOTHING can peak further back into the universe evolution beyond the CMS.

No, it isn't. All that is "mentioned so often" (btw, rather than a vague statement like this, you should give specific references) is that we can't see further back than the formation of the CMBR using electromagnetic radiation. But there are other sources of data that can tell us about events further back; newjerseyrunner mentioned a couple, but there are others as well, such as the relative abundances of light elements.
 
The OP question has been answered. Thread closed.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
2
Replies
67
Views
14K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Back
Top