- #1
p.tryon
- 51
- 0
Does the fact that a car burns fuel to keep it moving mean that we can truly say that the car is moving and not the earth? If so does this disprove the 1st postulate that maintains ALL uniform motion is relative?
*I know that objects in space don't require fuel to move at a constant speed relative to the solar system- but I am specifically interested in situations on Earth where frictional forces do matter.
*I know that objects in space don't require fuel to move at a constant speed relative to the solar system- but I am specifically interested in situations on Earth where frictional forces do matter.