Change EM Wavelength: Is There a Substance?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter klein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Em Wavelength
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of converting electromagnetic (EM) wavelengths from one part of the spectrum to another using a substance. Participants explore whether it is feasible to transform infrared radiation into visible light or other wavelengths, examining concepts related to energy conservation, material properties, and thermal radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if a substance can change EM wavelengths, specifically whether infrared can be converted into visible light.
  • Another participant asserts that emission radiation has lower energy than excitation, suggesting that such a conversion is not possible.
  • A different viewpoint discusses that while it is challenging to reverse the process, heating black objects can lead to the emission of visible light at high temperatures, indicating a potential for conversion under specific conditions.
  • Further elaboration includes the principle of conservation of energy, noting that passive materials can only re-emit light at longer wavelengths, with examples like fluorescence and phosphorescence.
  • Some participants mention that certain non-linear materials can upconvert light to shorter wavelengths through processes like harmonic generation, which involves absorbing multiple low-energy photons to emit one higher-energy photon.
  • Questions arise about the methods of heating materials, particularly whether infrared radiation alone can achieve the necessary temperatures for visible light emission.
  • It is noted that the efficiency of energy transfer and heat loss plays a critical role in whether a material can emit visible light when heated by infrared radiation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of converting EM wavelengths, with some asserting it is not possible while others suggest specific conditions under which it might occur. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the efficiency of energy transfer, the specific properties of materials discussed, and the conditions under which heating occurs. The discussion does not resolve the complexities of these factors.

klein
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Alright first time poster here with a question that has been eating at me for a while. I am curious to know if there is a substance that when one part of the EM spectrum is passed through it, it would come out as another. I know that if you are to shine a lightbulb on some black cloth you would get infrared radiation, but could you turn that infrared into red or back into all the visible light spectrum?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The emission radiation always has lower energy than the excitation, so the answer is NO.
 
I know that if you are to shine a lightbulb on some black cloth you would get infrared radiation, but could you turn that infrared into red or back into all the visible light spectrum?

With your example of a cloth it will be difficult to go "backwards", but in certain situations you can get visible light "back" out of black objects. For example, if you heat an iron stove to a certain temperature it will start to glow "red" and if you heat it much hotter it will start to glow "white", etc. The key idea here is you would have to raise the energy of the black object high enough so that as the atoms inside the material relax, they emit visible light. Only materials that can withstand large temperature increases can do this...
 
Renge Ishyo said:
With your example of a cloth it will be difficult to go "backwards", but in certain situations you can get visible light "back" out of black objects. For example, if you heat an iron stove to a certain temperature it will start to glow "red" and if you heat it much hotter it will start to glow "white", etc. The key idea here is you would have to raise the energy of the black object high enough so that as the atoms inside the material relax, they emit visible light. Only materials that can withstand large temperature increases can do this...

Hi Renge Ishyo,

I wonder how you can heat the iron stove up? Can you use only IR radiation to heat it to an extent that it glows?
 
klein said:
Alright first time poster here with a question that has been eating at me for a while. I am curious to know if there is a substance that when one part of the EM spectrum is passed through it, it would come out as another. I know that if you are to shine a lightbulb on some black cloth you would get infrared radiation, but could you turn that infrared into red or back into all the visible light spectrum?

The principle of conservation of energy implies that a passive material (i.e. no energy supplied to it) can only keep the wavelength the same, or re-emit the light at a longer wavelength- fluorescence and phosphorescence, for example. Your example of heating up a cloth with a lightbulb stretches the analogy becasue that is an incoherent process, but is basically correct.

Certain non-linear materials are able to upconvert light to shorter wavelengths, but this is done by (essentially) absorbing 2 photons at low energy and emitting 1 photon at a shorter wavelength (harmonic generation), so the principle of conservation of energy is still obeyed.
 
I wonder how you can heat the iron stove up? Can you use only IR radiation to heat it to an extent that it glows?

You can plug the stove into a wall socket for one. The emission spectrum is a function only of the temperature in the ideal case of a blackbody, and you can raise the temperature of a system by doing work on it or transferring heat to it. IR radiation can transfer heat to the extent that it glows providing that the system is confined and well insulated to prevent heat loss so that the temperature of the system doesn't decrease faster than you can transfer heat to it. You aren't going to get out the same amount of "visible" radiation that you put in, but when the temperature rises you can get it to glow eventually.

The original poster was thinking along these lines, but the problem is the light bulb he is shining on the cloth is transferring energy at such a slow rate that it is dissipating to the surroundings as heat long before it can concentrate and raise the temperature (which is needed to get out the visible light).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K