Change in Fermi level with gradient of doping concentration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between the Fermi level and doping concentration gradients in degenerate n-type semiconductors. It establishes that while the Fermi level remains constant throughout the system at equilibrium, the energy levels of the conduction and valence bands are influenced by the doping concentration and profile. Specifically, in a p-n junction, the conduction band energy varies between the n-region and p-region due to electrostatic potential differences in the depletion region. To analyze these changes quantitatively, one must solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation based on the dopant concentration profile.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of semiconductor physics, particularly n-type and p-type materials.
  • Familiarity with Fermi levels and their significance in semiconductor equilibrium.
  • Knowledge of energy band diagrams, especially in p-n junctions.
  • Proficiency in solving the Poisson-Boltzmann equation for charge distributions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Poisson-Boltzmann equation and its applications in semiconductor physics.
  • Explore energy band diagrams in detail, focusing on p-n junctions and doping profiles.
  • Investigate the effects of varying doping concentrations on semiconductor behavior.
  • Learn about the intrinsic Fermi level and its dependence on temperature and doping concentration.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, semiconductor physicists, and students studying solid-state electronics who are interested in the effects of doping on semiconductor properties.

HARSHARAJ
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In a degenerate n type semiconductor, when the doping concentration has a gradient(say -ve gradient), then how fermi energy level and intrinsic Fermi energy levels will depend upon the concentration gradient?
~If anyone knows anything about it, kindly help.
 
Last edited:
Hi, .
Fermi level is a property of the system at equilibrium so its value is the same everywhere within the system ( if there is no current flow).

However, the energy of the conduction and valence bands relative to the Fermi level does depend on the doping concentration.

Check this link. It gives you all the equations and graphs.
http://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/extrinsi.htm
 
My apology. I just realized I gave you an incomplete answer.

It is true that at equilibrium, the Fermi level is the same everywhere in the system.
However, the difference between the Fermi energy and conduction/valence band energy depends not only on the doping concentration but also on the doping profile.
Take, for example, an energy diagram of a p-n junction at equilibrium. This is a case when you have a change of doping concentration. In the n - region and far away from the junction, the conduction band bottom is close to the Fermi level. On the other side (p - region), the top of the conduction band is close to the Fermi level. But in the depletion mode, you have an electrostatic potential that adds to the value of the conduction band bottom (and valence band top).
But in the depletion region, the difference between the bottom of the conduction band and Fermi level changes from the bulk p region value to the bulk n region value. The change of the electron energy is due to potential energy difference because of unbalanced charge in the depletion region.

So, in general, the difference between the energy of a conduction (or valence) band will depend not only on local dopant concentration but also double integrated net charge density. So, given the dopant concentration profile, you really have to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation to get the answer.


Henryk
 
Thank you for the reply, the answer that you provided regarding the position of Ef and variation in position in Ec and Ev, I have also arrived there but what I didn't understood (physically) quite well is how and why the intrinsic fermi level changes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
81K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K