A Change in Fermi level with gradient of doping concentration

HARSHARAJ
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In a degenerate n type semiconductor, when the doping concentration has a gradient(say -ve gradient), then how fermi energy level and intrinsic Fermi energy levels will depend upon the concentration gradient?
~If anyone knows anything about it, kindly help.
 
Last edited:
Hi, .
Fermi level is a property of the system at equilibrium so its value is the same everywhere within the system ( if there is no current flow).

However, the energy of the conduction and valence bands relative to the Fermi level does depend on the doping concentration.

Check this link. It gives you all the equations and graphs.
http://ecee.colorado.edu/~bart/book/extrinsi.htm
 
My apology. I just realized I gave you an incomplete answer.

It is true that at equilibrium, the Fermi level is the same everywhere in the system.
However, the difference between the Fermi energy and conduction/valence band energy depends not only on the doping concentration but also on the doping profile.
Take, for example, an energy diagram of a p-n junction at equilibrium. This is a case when you have a change of doping concentration. In the n - region and far away from the junction, the conduction band bottom is close to the Fermi level. On the other side (p - region), the top of the conduction band is close to the Fermi level. But in the depletion mode, you have an electrostatic potential that adds to the value of the conduction band bottom (and valence band top).
But in the depletion region, the difference between the bottom of the conduction band and Fermi level changes from the bulk p region value to the bulk n region value. The change of the electron energy is due to potential energy difference because of unbalanced charge in the depletion region.

So, in general, the difference between the energy of a conduction (or valence) band will depend not only on local dopant concentration but also double integrated net charge density. So, given the dopant concentration profile, you really have to solve the Poisson-Boltzmann equation to get the answer.


Henryk
 
Thank you for the reply, the answer that you provided regarding the position of Ef and variation in position in Ec and Ev, I have also arrived there but what I didn't understood (physically) quite well is how and why the intrinsic fermi level changes.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top