Change in mechanical energy (gravitation)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding gravitational potential energy and the work required to place a satellite into orbit. The key point is that the work needed is determined by the difference in total mechanical energy between the satellite's grounded state and its orbital state, expressed as E2 - E1 = W. The mechanical energy equations used are E1 = K1 + U1 and E2 = K2 + U2, with K1 being zero when the satellite is grounded. The confusion arises from calculating work through changes in mechanical energy rather than just kinetic energy, which is clarified by relating it to the work-energy theorem. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding how external work contributes to the energy changes involved in launching a satellite into orbit.
vinicius0197
Messages
54
Reaction score
7
I got a little bit confused while studying gravitational potential energy, particularly the expression for long distances: (-GMm/r). An exercise asks me for the velocity, period and radial acceleration for a 1000kg satellite that I wish to put into orbit. That's okay. But after that, I'm questioned for the amount of work needed to put this satellite into orbit. The book says that the necessary work is given by the difference between the total mechanical energy when the satellite is in orbit and the total mechanical energy when the satellite is grounded. The book uses the equation: (E=-GMm/2r) for mechanical energy - where M is the mass of the Earth and r is the distance between the satellite and the center of the Earth.
That confuses me. I know that, by the work-energy theorem that work equals the change in kinetic energy, and I know that the change in gravitational potential energy equals minus Work (delta U = -W). But calculating work by change in mechanical energy is new for me. Where does it come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try using the work energy theorem here.
 
vinicius0197 said:
I got a little bit confused while studying gravitational potential energy, particularly the expression for long distances: (-GMm/r). An exercise asks me for the velocity, period and radial acceleration for a 1000kg satellite that I wish to put into orbit. That's okay. But after that, I'm questioned for the amount of work needed to put this satellite into orbit. The book says that the necessary work is given by the difference between the total mechanical energy when the satellite is in orbit and the total mechanical energy when the satellite is grounded. The book uses the equation: (E=-GMm/2r) for mechanical energy - where M is the mass of the Earth and r is the distance between the satellite and the center of the Earth.
That confuses me. I know that, by the work-energy theorem that work equals the change in kinetic energy, and I know that the change in gravitational potential energy equals minus Work (delta U = -W). But calculating work by change in mechanical energy is new for me. Where does it come from?
The total mechanical energy in the initial position (grounded):
E1 = K1 + U1 ; K is kinetic energy and U is gravitational potential energy. Since it is grounded, K1 = 0
While it is in orbit, the total mechanical energy is:
E2 = K2 + U2
The difference in energy has to come from somewhere. That is external work. It could be because of the exhaust gases, or Superman throws the satellite into orbit, or whatever. So
E2 - E1 = W (1)
The same thing can be done starting from the work - kinetic energy theorem:
ΔK = K2 - K1 = Work done by gravity + Work by other forces (gases, Superman, whatever) (2)
Work done by gravity = - ΔU = - (U2 - U1) (3)
substitute (3) into (2) and rearrange the terms to get (1)
 
  • Like
Likes vinicius0197
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top