Change in Voltage across a Capacitor?

AI Thread Summary
Increasing the charge (Q) on a capacitor does not necessarily increase the voltage (V) across it if the capacitance (C) remains constant, as defined by the equation C = Q/V. When a capacitor is connected to a battery, the voltage remains constant regardless of changes in distance between the plates, while the charge can vary. Conversely, if the capacitor is disconnected, the charge stays constant, preventing any flow and maintaining the voltage until discharge occurs. Adjustments to capacitance while connected to a battery can lead to a temporary change in voltage, influenced by the circuit's time constant. Understanding these principles is crucial for applications like capacitor microphones.
Dekans6
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
When you increase the charge Q on a capacitor, why don't you increase voltage V across it as well? Wouldn't higher Q increase E, and since V = Ed for a uniform E, V increases also? I know that for a uniform E across a capacitor, E stays the same regardless of distance d between the two plates, but doesn't the amount of charge on the capacitor still affect E (and would therefore affect V)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would agree with you, that an increase in Q should increase V. The capacitance of a capacitor is given by

<br /> C = \frac{Q}{V}<br />

where C depends on the physical properties of the capacitor. Stuff like the plate geometry and the medium between the plates. If C is constant, then V should scale linearly with Q.
 
Fenn said:
I would agree with you, that an increase in Q should increase V. The capacitance of a capacitor is given by

<br /> C = \frac{Q}{V}<br />

where C depends on the physical properties of the capacitor. Stuff like the plate geometry and the medium between the plates. If C is constant, then V should scale linearly with Q.

true Q=CV
 
Also, just to clarify:

The difference b/w a charged capacitor disconnected from a battery and one that is still connected to a battery is that the latter maintains a constant V across the capacitor regardless of distance d between the plates, and the former maintains a constant Q on the plates (assuming there's no discharge)?


V = Ed

C = eA/d

Q = CV

Thanks
 
That is correct. If you are adjusting the capacitance by any method, then the voltage will remain constant if there is an applied potential from a battery. If the capacitor is disconnected from any external device, the charge cannot flow, and thus Q will remain constant.
 
Fenn said:
That is correct. If you are adjusting the capacitance by any method, then the voltage will remain constant if there is an applied potential from a battery. If the capacitor is disconnected from any external device, the charge cannot flow, and thus Q will remain constant.

And in addition to this if C is adjusted with the battery connected it takes time for V to come back to its original value this time depending on the time constant(RC) of the circuit.I think this is the principle behind the capacitor microphone.
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top