Change of variables for multiple integrals (3)

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 4K views
kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
Q1: Let S be the region in the first quadrant bounded by the curves xy=1, xy=3, x2 - y2 = 1, and x2 - y2 = 4. Compute
∫∫(x2 + y2)dA.
S
(Hint: Let G(x,y)=(xy, x2 - y2). What is |det DG|?)


Solution:
http://www.geocities.com/asdfasdf23135/advcal19.JPG

I don't understand the third and fourth equalities in the solutions. Can someone kindly explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you don't understand why
[tex]\int\int_S(x^2+ y^2)dA= \frac{1}{2}\int\int_S |det DG| dA[/tex]
then you have missed the whole point of this section! |det DG| is the "Jacobian" and |det DG| dA is the differential in terms of the new variables u= xy, v= x2- y2.
[tex]det DG= \left[\begin{array}{cc}\frac{\partial xy}{\partial x} & \frac{\partial x^2- y^2}{\partial x} \\ \frac{\partial xy}{\partial y} & \frac{\partial x^2- y^2}{\partial y}\end{array}\right]= \left[\begin{array}{cc}y & 2x \\ x & -2y\end{array}\right]= -2(x^2+ y^2)[/itex]<br /> as they say so |det dG|= 2(x<sup>2</sup>+ y<sup>2</sup>). You already have x<sup>2</sup>+ y<sup>2</sup> in the integral so you only need to multiply inside the integral by 2 and multiply outside the integral by 1/2 to get [itex]1/2 \int\int |det dG|dA[/itex].<br /> <br /> Now, for the limits of integration. Your region is bounded by xy= 1, xy= 3, x<sup>2</sup>- y<sup>2</sup>= 1 and x<sup>2</sup>- y<sup>2</sup>= 4. That, of course, was the reason for the choice of G. With u= xy, u= xy= 1 and u= xy= 3 are the u limits of integration. With v= x<sup>2</sup>- y<sup>2</sup>, v= x<sup>2</sup>- y<sup>2</sup>= 1 and v= x<sup>2</sup>- y<sup>2</sup>= 4 are the v limits of integration.[/tex]
 
Change of variables theorem says
∫∫f(x,y)dA
S
=∫∫f(G(u))|det DG| dudv ?
G-1(S)

So you should add the Jaconbian factor, but why are they moving it away? (it seems that they are doing it the oppposite way than the theorem states)



For the fourth equality, I don't understand why |det DG| disappeared.
 
You are going in the wrong direction.
Suppose you had the problem [itex]\int x dx[/itex] (yes, I know that's trivial!) and you decide to make the substitution u= x2 (yes, I know that's a peculiar choice!). Then du= 2x dx so (1/2)du= xdx. Since you already have "xdx" in the integral, in terms of u, you have just [itex](1/2)\int du= (1/2)u+ C= (1/2)x^2+ C[/itex]. The "x" inside the integral was "absorbed" into the du.