Change of weight with faster Earth rotation.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the effects of Earth's rotation on weight, specifically how an increase in rotation could lead to a bathroom scale reading of zero. The key equation involves balancing gravitational force (Fg) with centripetal force (Fc), leading to the conclusion that Fg equals Fc when weight is effectively negated. The participant attempts to derive the velocity of rotation using centripetal force equations but struggles with the concept of setting Fg to zero. Clarifications indicate that while Fg should not be zero, the centripetal force does provide a small upward force that can affect weight readings. Overall, the problem is deemed manageable, with minor adjustments needed for accuracy.
tkninetyfive
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



m=55kg
r=6400km
The Earth's rotation increases so on a bathroom scale, it now reads that you weight 0.
how long is 1 "day" on Earth?


Homework Equations



I keep trying to figure this one out, but with different ways I've tried, I put Fg as 0 and it basically negates my whole equation. The section in the course we are on right now is Centrapetal force and gravitation.



The Attempt at a Solution



This is the one "answer" I've gotten but it seems a little too easy.

fnet=ma
fc=mac
fc=mv2/r
mg=mv2/r
g=v2/r
√rg=v

plug in the radius in metres, 9.8 for g to get v, and then solve with 2∏r/v which is the same a d/v=t.

any help? :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quite right.

Initial weight = mg = 55*9.81 Newtons
Centripetal force = mv^2/r.

Since the weight is balanced exactly by this force, we must have
mg =mv^2/r ,which gives v.
 
tkninetyfive said:
I keep trying to figure this one out, but with different ways I've tried, I put Fg as 0 and it basically negates my whole equation. The section in the course we are on right now is Centrapetal force and gravitation.

The reason you can't do F_{g} = 0 is because it isn't 0. What you want is F_{net} = 0 = F_{g} - F{c} \Rightarrow F_{g} = F_{c}

It looks like this is what you ended up doing, and I don't see any problems with your attempt. I don't think it was meant to be a hugely difficult problem.

Edit: To be completely accurate, the normal centripetal force of the Earth supplies about 2 Newtons (or so, depending on your mass) of upward force, so to be completely accurate you could show how to find this "usual" centripetal force, and then factor that in. Since a normal person weighs somewhere in the 600-ish Newton range though, it should only make a small difference in your answer.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top