Changing/Controling relative permeability

AI Thread Summary
Controlling relative permeability in metamaterials involves creating resonant structures that allow for precise manipulation of both permeability and permittivity. This is often achieved by exciting surface plasmons in nanoparticles or designing unit cells that mimic resonant behavior, similar to an L-C circuit. The goal is to achieve negative values for both permeability and permittivity while minimizing losses. Utilizing distributed effects through periodic structures is essential for achieving the desired material properties. Ultimately, fine control over these parameters opens up new possibilities in material science and engineering applications.
jupiter13
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

I've been looking at metamaterials, and it's quite an overwhelming subtopic to be introduced to. Most of the stuff I'm finding has to do with negative permeabilities. I'm wondering how exactly we control what relative permeability a material has and how fine that control is, not just so that its a negative value, but that it's any value other than what you'd measure if you found it in nature?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The most common is to create a resonant structure such that the permeability and permittivity resonate like in a plasma. If you recall, the resonanct behavior causes the imaginary part to peak and the real part to change sign. By controlling the resonances, we can get both the permeability and permittivity to be negative at the same time in addition to hopefully have a small amount of loss. Such resonances can be done naturally by exciting surface plasmons in nanoparticles. If we permeate a material with nanoparticles and excite a surface plasmon on the particles, then the bulk effect is like there is a plasma behavior throughout the material itself. Or we can build a unit cell that exhibits resonant behavior (like an L-C circuit) and build up a material off of these unit cells.

In the end, what we have to do is use distributed effects to get the behavior that we want. So must of the time you will be dealing with periodic structures.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Back
Top