Courses Is It Fair to Change Course Difficulty Mid-Year?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the fairness of grade disparities resulting from changes in course difficulty and instructor quality at universities. A student noted that many peers failed a challenging course, leading to the removal of the lecturer and simplification of the content and assessments. This raises concerns about academic fairness, particularly regarding GPA and scholarship opportunities, as newer students may achieve similar or better grades in an easier version of the course. Participants acknowledged that faculty often rotate teaching assignments, which can lead to experiences with both difficult and easier professors. While some believe that tougher courses enhance understanding of the material, others argue that easing course difficulty contributes to academic inflation, diminishing the value of degrees over time. Overall, the conversation reflects a tension between maintaining academic rigor and ensuring equitable grading standards.
PhysDrew
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
My question relates to a subject I took last semester, which since then I have found out that a lot of students failed and complained that it was too hard and the lecturer wasn't satisfactory. The university has since removed that lecturer and simpified the content and the assessment pieces. Is this common practice in universities? I ended up getting a distinction in the subject, but people who have done the subject since it was revised may get the same or better mark. This seems unfair if GPA, positions, and bursaries are on the line. What do you think?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's common for faculty to rotate what courses they teach, it's just part of life. I ran into the situation many times and usually had the "more difficult" professor. The grades might have suffered a little bit, but I found that I understood the material a lot better than my classmates who took the "easier" class.
 
This is the reason academic inflation exists, over time the degrees tend to mean less and less since it is an easy short term solution to just make things easier.
 
Klockan3 said:
This is the reason academic inflation exists, over time the degrees tend to mean less and less since it is an easy short term solution to just make things easier.
Funny you should mention that, since I was of the opinion this beast exists up until yesterday, as well, but reading http://www.alfiekohn.org/teaching/gi.htm" kind of made me revise that stance a bit.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
fss said:
It's common for faculty to rotate what courses they teach, it's just part of life. I ran into the situation many times and usually had the "more difficult" professor. The grades might have suffered a little bit, but I found that I understood the material a lot better than my classmates who took the "easier" class.

Yeah I find my understanding seems to be a lot better, but still varying the degrees in the middle of an academic year seems wrong. But that's life I guess. Good to hear others have had the same experience. Thanks for the replies!
 
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top