Changing the resistance of a voltmeter

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a voltmeter connected to a galvanic cell, particularly focusing on how the voltmeter's finite resistance affects its reading. Participants explore the implications of current flow through the voltmeter and the internal resistance of the cell.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to understand the circuit configuration and the role of the voltmeter's resistance. Questions arise about the relationship between total current, voltage drop, and how the voltmeter measures voltage when it has finite resistance. Some participants express confusion about whether the voltmeter acts as a resistor in parallel or series.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various insights into the circuit's behavior. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the voltmeter's resistance and the readings, but multiple interpretations of the circuit setup are still being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of assumptions regarding the internal resistance of the galvanic cell and the nature of the voltmeter's resistance. The discussion reflects uncertainty about the definitions and implications of terminal voltage and emf in the context of the circuit.

pp280
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The setup shows a Galvanic cell connected to a voltmeter. The question asks how the reading of the voltmeter would change if the voltmeter's resistance became finite (instead of infinite) and current started to pass through the voltmeter.

The answer given is "The reading will decrease because the voltage decreases as the current increases"

I've tried drawing circuit diagrams to show this, but I'm stuck. Here's how I approach the problem:

First, I draw a circuit with a battery and a single resistor. The galvanic cell is the voltage source and I assume there is some internal resistance in the circuit. Since the voltmeter initially has infinite resistance, I leave it out.

When the voltmeter shorts, that's like adding another resistor in parallel. However, I don't see why this would change the voltage measurement. Adding a resistor in parallel decreases the total resistance of the circuit, and causes the total current to increase. BUT isn't it the case that while the total current in the circuit is greater than before, it splits in such a way that the same voltage drop occurs across both resistors?

As far as the given answer's reference to voltage decreasing as current increases, that sounds like P= IV, but I can't see how that would enter the picture.

Would appreciate any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Voltmeter consists of a galvanometer with a high resistance in series with it. Galvanometer is calibrated to measure the voltage depending on the small current flowing through it. When it is connected across the galvanic cell, current flows through the small internal resistance and high external resistance.
The emf of the cell is given by E = I*r + I*R.
The voltmeter shows only I*R reading. If you reduce R, the current will be more . But I*r drop will also be more. By changing R, emf of the cell does not change. Hence the voltage reading will decrease.
 
The main point is that the galvanic cell has internal resistance.

The equivalent circuit is an ideal battery in series with a resistor.
 
jambaugh - That's what I assumed. If that's the main point perhaps I'm missing something. Could you clarify? The confusing issue is what the voltmeter does when it has a finite resistance. Does it act like a resistor in parallel? Or is it a resistor in series as rl.baht seems to be saying?

rl.bhat - are you saying that the equivalent circuit is actually 2 resistors in series? I didn't quite follow your explanation about the voltmeter involving two resistors. I can see that IF the circuit was set up in the way you suggest: E = I*r + I*R things would make sense, but I'm not convinced as to why the circuit should be set up that way. Also, why is it that the voltmeter only measures I*R?
 
pp280 said:
rl.bhat - are you saying that the equivalent circuit is actually 2 resistors in series? I didn't quite follow your explanation about the voltmeter involving two resistors. I can see that IF the circuit was set up in the way you suggest: E = I*r + I*R things would make sense, but I'm not convinced as to why the circuit should be set up that way. Also, why is it that the voltmeter only measures I*R?

Yes. The circuit is actually 2 resistors in series.
The voltmeter measures the voltage across the terminals of the cell. That is why it is called the terminal voltage.
Definition of emf is the amount of work done to take a unit positive round the circuit. If there is any resistance in the path, some amount of the work is lost. Ideal voltmeter measures without taking current. And ideal cell is one which has zero internal resistance.
So the terminal voltage is E - I*r
 
Basically the voltmeter is measuring the a microcurrent through a calibrated high-value resistor. Say for example 100 mega-ohms so ten microamps corresponds to a volt.

Now say the Cell has internal voltage of 1 Ohm and terminal voltage of 1 volt. With this setup you get an actual series resistance of 100,000,001 Ohms and current of about 9.9999999 microamps which reads as 0.99999999 volts.

Recalibrate the voltmeter to a 1000 ohm load and 1 milliamp per volt and you'll get total 1001 ohm series resistance with current of 0.999 miliamps which reads as 0.999 volts.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K