Changing variable in summation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhenrique
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation Variable
Jhenrique
Messages
676
Reaction score
4
Like in the integration, exist a formula to compute the summation by parts, that is: \frac{\Delta }{\Delta x}(f(x)g(x))=\frac{\Delta f}{\Delta x}g+f\frac{\Delta g}{\Delta x}+\frac{\Delta f}{\Delta x}\frac{\Delta g}{\Delta x}\sum \frac{\Delta }{\Delta x}(f(x)g(x))\Delta x = \sum \frac{\Delta f}{\Delta x}g\Delta x + \sum f\frac{\Delta g}{\Delta x}\Delta x + \sum \frac{\Delta f}{\Delta x}\frac{\Delta g}{\Delta x}\Delta x\sum f(x) \frac{\Delta g}{\Delta x}(x)\Delta x = f g - \sum \frac{\Delta f}{\Delta x} g \Delta x - \sum \frac{\Delta f}{\Delta x} \frac{\Delta g}{\Delta x}\Delta xhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indefinite_sum#Summation_by_parts

But in the integration is possbile make a change the variable (integration by substitution). So, analogously, is possible to make a change the variable in the summation too?

I tried some like:\sum f(x) \Delta x =\sum f(x(u)) \frac{\Delta x}{\Delta u} \Delta uBut, I think that this identity is wrong, because my calculus are wrong using this formula.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think you've done the substitution correctly.

If you want:
$$\sum_{i=1}^N f(u(x_i))\Delta x = \sum_{i=1}^N g(u_i)\Delta u : u_i=u(x_i)$$

Then you want $$g(u_i) = f(x_i)\frac{\Delta x}{\Delta u} : x_i = h(u_i)=u^{-1}(u_i)$$

i.e. ##f(u(x))dx \rightarrow f(u)(dx/du)du##
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top