MHB Chapter 36 Problem #9 Diffraction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Federico1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance between the first two diffraction minima for a single slit diffraction pattern. Given a slit width of 1.00 mm and light wavelength of 589 nm, the relevant formula for determining the positions of minima is derived from the diffraction equation. The screen is positioned 3.00 m away from the slit, which factors into the calculations. Participants are encouraged to share the applicable formulas and methods for solving the problem. The focus remains on applying the correct principles of diffraction to find the solution.
Federico1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A slit 1.00mm wide is illuminated by light of wavelength 589nm. We see a diffraction pattern on a screen 3.00m away. What is the distance between the first two diffraction minima on the same side of the central diffraction maximum?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Federico said:
A slit 1.00mm wide is illuminated by light of wavelength 589nm. We see a diffraction pattern on a screen 3.00m away. What is the distance between the first two diffraction minima on the same side of the central diffraction maximum?

Hi Federico! Welcome to MHB! :)

Which formula do you have that applies to diffraction patterns?
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top