Charge density and the Heaviside stepfunction

AI Thread Summary
The Heaviside step function is used to describe charge density when there is a step change, such as a transition from zero charge density to a constant value at a certain point. For example, a charge density of p coulombs per unit volume for x >= 0 can be represented as p * H(x). In contrast, the Dirac delta function is applied for point, line, or plane charges, such as a plane charge density represented as p * delta(x) or a point charge as q * delta(x) * delta(y) * delta(z). The choice between these functions depends on whether the charge distribution is continuous or discrete. Understanding when to use each function is crucial for accurately modeling charge densities in physics.
khary23
Messages
92
Reaction score
6
I wanted to ask if someone can clarify for me when one would use the Heaviside function instead of (or in combination with) the Dirac delta function.
Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you were describing charge density, then the Heaviside step function would be used when you have a step in the charge density. For example if the charge density were zero for x<0 and p coulombs per unit volume for x >=0, then the charge density would be p * H(x) coulombs per unit volume. The Dirac delta function is used when you have a point charge, or maybe a line charge or maybe a plane charge. If you have a plane charge density that is p coulombs per unit area and the plane is the y-z plane then the charge density is p*delta(x) coulombs per unit volume. If its a line charge of p coulombs per unit length, and the line is the x axis, then the charge density is p * delta(y)*delta(z) coulombs per unit volume. If its a point charge with charge q, and the point is at the origin, then the charge density is q*delta(x)*delta(y)*delta(z) coulombs per unit volume.
 
Thank you for that very clear explanation.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top