Charge density higher on sharp ends

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the ratio of electric fields at the surfaces of two connected conducting spheres with different radii. The electric field outside a sphere is expressed as E = q / (4πε₀r²), but confusion arises due to the unknown charge on each sphere. Since the spheres are connected by a wire, they must have the same electric potential, which can be used to determine their relative charges. This relationship helps explain why charge density is higher at sharp and pointed ends of a conductor compared to flatter areas. Ultimately, the concentration of charge at points leads to stronger electric fields in those regions.
Quantumkid
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two charged conducting spheres of radii a and b are connected to
each other by a wire. What is the ratio of electric fields at the surfaces
of the two spheres? Use the result obtained to explain why charge
density on the sharp and pointed ends of a conductor is higher
than on its flatter portions.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


first part can be done by using the fact that electric field outside the sphere is given by E = q / 4(pi)(e_0)r^2
some confusion at second one
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quantumkid said:

Homework Statement


Two charged conducting spheres of radii a and b are connected to
each other by a wire. What is the ratio of electric fields at the surfaces
of the two spheres? Use the result obtained to explain why charge
density on the sharp and pointed ends of a conductor is higher
than on its flatter portions.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


first part can be done by using the fact that electric field outside the sphere is given by E = q / 4(pi)(e_0)r^2
some confusion at second one
You don't know the charge on each sphere, so E = q / (4(π)(ε0)r2) will not get you anywhere until you do know those relative charge values. (Also, parentheses are important.)

The spheres are connected by a wire so their surfaces are at the same potential. Use that to find the relative charge on the spheres.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top