Charge density of a disk with radius a in cylindrical coordinates

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the uniform charge density of a disk in cylindrical coordinates and identifying mistakes in the formulation. The correct charge density is expressed as ρ(x) = Q(δ(z)Θ(a-ρ))/(2πa²), while an incorrect formulation led to the term ρ vanishing in the denominator. The conversation highlights the importance of using the correct coordinate system and approach, especially when transitioning to spherical coordinates. A participant requests clarification on why the initial formulation fails in spherical coordinates and invites others to share their calculations for better understanding. The exchange emphasizes the need for precise mathematical representation in electrostatics problems.
hokhani
Messages
556
Reaction score
17
To write the uniform charge density of a disk with radius a in cylindrical coordinates, If we do this form:
\rho (x)=\frac{A\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)}{\rho} (A is constant that sholud be determined and \thetais step function), we get A=\frac{Q}{2\pi a} and so:
\rho (x)=\frac{\frac{Q}{2\pi a}\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)}{\rho}
But we know that the correct one is:
\rho (x)=Q\frac{\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)}{2\pi a^2}.
Could anyone please tell me what is my mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
While I'm no expert on the subject, I DO notice that your "ro" term suddenly vanishes (term in the denominator).
 
Try starting with \rho (x)=A\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)
 
dauto said:
Try starting with \rho (x)=A\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)

Ok, in this special case it gives the correct answer, but in the spherical coordinate system it doesn't give the correct answer. My principle question is what is the routine way of solving such problems?
 
Take a cylindrical disk of finite height filled uniformly with a total charge Q. Obviously the charge density is given by
\rho=\frac{Q}{\pi a^2 h} \Theta(a-r_{\perp}) \Theta(-h/2<z<h/2).
I write r_{\perp} for the radial coordinate in order to avoid conflicts with \rho as the symbol for the charge density. In the limit h \rightarrow 0^+ this gives
\rho=\frac{Q}{\pi a^2} \Theta(a-r_{\perp}) \delta(z).
You can easily check that this gives you the correct total charge,
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \rho(\vec{x})=\int_{0}^{a} \mathrm{d} r_{\perp} \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \varphi \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d}z r_{\perp} \frac{Q}{\pi a^2} \delta(z) = \frac{Q}{\pi a^2} 2 \pi \frac{a^2}{2}=Q.
 
hokhani said:
Ok, in this special case it gives the correct answer, but in the spherical coordinate system it doesn't give the correct answer. My principle question is what is the routine way of solving such problems?

What do you mean it doesn't work in spherical coordinates? If you post your calculation I might be able to comment.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top