Charge density of a disk with radius a in cylindrical coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the uniform charge density of a disk with radius 'a' in cylindrical coordinates. The initial formulation presented was incorrect, leading to confusion regarding the correct expression for charge density. The accurate representation is given by ρ(x) = Q(δ(z)Θ(a - ρ))/(2πa²), which ensures the total charge integrates correctly. The participants emphasize the importance of correctly applying the delta function and step function in cylindrical coordinates, particularly when transitioning to spherical coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of charge density concepts in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with delta functions and step functions in mathematical physics
  • Knowledge of cylindrical and spherical coordinate systems
  • Basic integration techniques in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of delta functions in electrostatics
  • Learn about charge density formulations in spherical coordinates
  • Explore the mathematical properties of step functions and their applications
  • Investigate the integration of charge densities over different coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in electromagnetism, as well as mathematicians dealing with coordinate transformations and charge distributions.

hokhani
Messages
579
Reaction score
20
To write the uniform charge density of a disk with radius a in cylindrical coordinates, If we do this form:
\rho (x)=\frac{A\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)}{\rho} (A is constant that sholud be determined and \thetais step function), we get A=\frac{Q}{2\pi a} and so:
\rho (x)=\frac{\frac{Q}{2\pi a}\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)}{\rho}
But we know that the correct one is:
\rho (x)=Q\frac{\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)}{2\pi a^2}.
Could anyone please tell me what is my mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
While I'm no expert on the subject, I DO notice that your "ro" term suddenly vanishes (term in the denominator).
 
Try starting with \rho (x)=A\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)
 
dauto said:
Try starting with \rho (x)=A\delta(z)\Theta (a-\rho)

Ok, in this special case it gives the correct answer, but in the spherical coordinate system it doesn't give the correct answer. My principle question is what is the routine way of solving such problems?
 
Take a cylindrical disk of finite height filled uniformly with a total charge Q. Obviously the charge density is given by
\rho=\frac{Q}{\pi a^2 h} \Theta(a-r_{\perp}) \Theta(-h/2<z<h/2).
I write r_{\perp} for the radial coordinate in order to avoid conflicts with \rho as the symbol for the charge density. In the limit h \rightarrow 0^+ this gives
\rho=\frac{Q}{\pi a^2} \Theta(a-r_{\perp}) \delta(z).
You can easily check that this gives you the correct total charge,
\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{x} \rho(\vec{x})=\int_{0}^{a} \mathrm{d} r_{\perp} \int_0^{2 \pi} \mathrm{d} \varphi \int_{\mathbb{R}} \mathrm{d}z r_{\perp} \frac{Q}{\pi a^2} \delta(z) = \frac{Q}{\pi a^2} 2 \pi \frac{a^2}{2}=Q.
 
hokhani said:
Ok, in this special case it gives the correct answer, but in the spherical coordinate system it doesn't give the correct answer. My principle question is what is the routine way of solving such problems?

What do you mean it doesn't work in spherical coordinates? If you post your calculation I might be able to comment.
 
Thread 'Colors in a plasma globe'
I have a common plasma globe with blue streamers and orange pads at both ends. The orange light is emitted by neon and the blue light is presumably emitted by argon and xenon. Why are the streamers blue while the pads at both ends are orange? A plasma globe's electric field is strong near the central electrode, decreasing with distance, so I would not expect the orange color at both ends.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
508
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K