Charge distribution on a power line

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electrostatic E-field and charge distribution of power lines, particularly focusing on the implications of geometry and voltage. Participants explore theoretical approaches to understanding these concepts in the context of both DC and AC power transmission.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about calculating the charge distribution and E-field from a single wire in free space, specifying parameters such as voltage, diameter, and length.
  • Another participant suggests that the approximation of self-capacitance may differ from real capacitance in power lines, prompting further exploration.
  • There is a discussion about the relevance of the E-field near the ground and whether the calculations should consider AC or DC conditions.
  • A participant introduces the "method of images" to account for the Earth as a flat conductor at zero potential, suggesting the use of an imaginary line of charge underground.
  • One participant proposes a specific scenario involving a power line at 12 kV rms and asks for the calculation of the maximum radial E-field and the three-phase E-field at ground level.
  • Another participant acknowledges the proposed E-field value and mentions the natural DC field of the Earth, highlighting the reduced field profile of three-phase power.
  • There is a reminder about the alternating nature of AC fields and a suggestion to ignore differences between single-phase and three-phase fields at ground level.
  • A participant expresses concern about the lack of clarity regarding the types of E-fields presented on a referenced website, indicating a need for further investigation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the calculations and implications of E-fields and charge distributions, with no consensus reached on the specific methods or results. The discussion remains open-ended with multiple competing views.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the dependence of calculations on assumptions regarding frequency (AC vs. DC) and the geometry of the power lines. There are unresolved questions about the accuracy of approximations and the specifics of E-field calculations.

lagrangman
Messages
13
Reaction score
2
I was trying to calculate the EMFs from power lines, just to see how they correspond to transmission line right of ways, and got a little stuck calculating the electrostatic E-field (-∇V) from power lines. I know it is dependent on the charge distribution on the power line, which is in turn dependent on the geometry.

So I have two questions:

How does one calculate the charge distribution or E-field from a single wire in free space at voltage V, with diameter d and length l?

How close is this approximation of self-capacitance to real capacitance encountered in power lines?

Thanks a lot.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
lagrangman said:
I was trying to calculate the EMFs from power lines, just to see how they correspond to transmission line right of ways, and got a little stuck calculating the electrostatic E-field (-∇V) from power lines. I know it is dependent on the charge distribution on the power line, which is in turn dependent on the geometry.

So I have two questions:

How does one calculate the charge distribution or E-field from a single wire in free space at voltage V, with diameter d and length l?

How close is this approximation of self-capacitance to real capacitance encountered in power lines?

Thanks a lot.
I assume you want the potentials "far" from the wires..like near the ground. The details of the distribution won't really matter.
Is this DC??
 
Yes, I want the E-field near ground (as in the laymans ground). I was thinking for AC, but I figured it is low enough frequency that the max radial E-field would be the same as DC.
 
The Earth is flat conductor at zero potential (for low frequency). So one uses the "method of images" and puts an imaginary opposite line of charge underground. The field is the sum of the two.
 
So if a power line is at 12 kV rms (amplitude of 17 kV) single line Earth return, with a pole height of 20 meters, would the max radial E-field be approximately 850 V/m?

Also, how would I go about calculating the three phase E-field at near layman's ground?

Thanks a lot for your help so far.
 
That seems a reasonable result.
You should also be aware that the Earth itself has a natural DC field of several hundred V/M from surface to ionosphere!
Three phase power gives a very very much reduced extended field profile...it is one reason it is so popular. Read up on it a little and I will try to answer questions (and there are other people here who really know this stuff !).
 
Don't forget with AC, that the field goes through zero and reverses direction 120 times per second.

At ground level, you shouldn't see much difference between single phase and three phase, so I would ignore it.

Here is a website dedicated to just the kind of info you're asking about.

http://www.emfs.info/sources/overhead/
Here is one of the graphics from that site.
1564263935382.png
 
Thanks a lot for the help. I did see that website, but it did not seem to specify whether the E-fields were radial (-∇V) or axial (##-\frac{1}{c}\frac{dA}{dt}##) or how they were calculated. I will definitely read up on it more.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K