Charge on Capacitor: Where Does the Extra Go?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phantom113
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor Charge
AI Thread Summary
When extra charge is added to one plate of a parallel-plate capacitor, it induces an equal but opposite charge on the adjacent plate, while the total charge on the opposite plate adjusts accordingly. The extra charge does not physically move across the gap between the plates, as charge cannot jump that distance. The discussion raises questions about the source of the extra charge and the connections of the plates. Ultimately, the extra charge remains on the plate, inducing changes in the electric field and charge distribution on the opposite plate. Understanding these principles is essential for grasping capacitor behavior in circuits.
phantom113
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If you put more charge on one plate of a parallel-plate capacitor than on the other, where does the extra charge go?

The Attempt at a Solution


Does the extra charge induce the same amount of opposite charge on the near side of the plate and therefore the same amount of same charge on the far side of the opposite plate? Or does the extra charge actually move somewhere?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phantom113 said:
If you put more charge on one plate of a parallel-plate capacitor than on the other, where does the extra charge go?

uhh? :confused: charge can't jump the gap, so if you "put" it there, it just stays there

i don't really understand the rest of the question …

what's producing the extra charge? …

what is either plate connected to? …

was that the complete question?
 
That was the complete question. I figure there is nowhere for it to go so here is what I am thinking: if the initial charge on the top plate was Q and the initial charge on the bottom plate was -Q then after the charge is added the charge on the top plate is Q+S and that induces a charge of +S on the bottom of the bottom plate and a charge of -(Q+S) on the top of the bottom plate. Is that correct?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top