Charge Sharing between two metal spheres

AI Thread Summary
When two metal spheres are connected by a wire, charge will redistribute until both spheres reach the same electric potential. The total charge is the sum of the individual charges, which is 0.24 µC. To find the final charges on each sphere, the equation (kQ1)/R1 = (kQ2)/R2 is used, where k is the electrostatic constant and R represents the radius of each sphere. By solving these equations simultaneously, the final charge on one sphere can be determined, leading to the conclusion that 6.94 x 10^-2 µC will move along the wire. Understanding this process is crucial for applying these concepts in future physics problems.
diesel55
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Two small metal spheres are located 3.0 m apart. One has radius 0.48 cm and carries charge 0.15 uC. The other has radius 0.95 cm and carries charge 0.090 uC.

If the two spheres were suddenly connected by a thin wire, how much charge would move along it?

This is a question that I have been trying to solve for over a week and still can't get. Please Help. I need a detailed explanation because I know this concept will be used in later chapters.

I know I will add Q1 + Q2 = .24 uC
I was also told that V1 = V2
So (kQ1)/R1 = (kQ2)/R2

I was told to solve for one and plug it into the other, but I don't see the logic.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If someone could please help me with this problem. I know the answer is 6.94*10-2 uC but I have no idea how to get that answer. I need to know this process so I can apply it in my current homework.
 
you want the final charges, it means they should come to equilibrium,it means that there shouldn't be any current between them, it happens when they have the same potential.
So assuming Q1 over first one and Q2 over second one when thay have radiuses R1 and R2
(kQ1)/R1 = (kQ2)/R2
and using Q1+Q2=Qtotal you can find charge on each one.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

The energy needed to construct a charged hollow spherical shell with finite thickness
Replies
1
Views
737
Point charge with very thin metal sheet along a spherical surface
Replies
21
Views
2K
Two spheres with a conducting wire
Replies
3
Views
2K
Electromagnetism problem: Merging of 2 charged drops of mercury
Replies
2
Views
1K
Charge rearrangement on conducting spheres
Replies
21
Views
4K
Calculating the surface charge of a sphere and a conducting shell
Replies
5
Views
4K
Charge distribution on spheres with varying radii
Replies
11
Views
8K
Kinetic and potential energy of a particle attracted by charged sphere
Replies
6
Views
1K
Electric potential due to collection of charged particles
Replies
3
Views
2K
Understanding Electrostatics: Calculating Potential of Metal Spheres
Replies
1
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top