Charging a system of metal rods

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rijulg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charging Metal System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the charging of a system of two metal rods, focusing on the magnitude of charge that can be accumulated on the rods and the maximum possible charge to prevent electrical discharge. The scope includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning related to electric fields and charge distribution in conductive materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to determine the magnitude and maximum charge on two metal rods placed apart, before connecting them to a battery.
  • Another participant references the electric field of a charged rod, suggesting a relationship between charge density (λ) and distance (r) to calculate maximum charge, but expresses doubt about the method's applicability.
  • A participant questions the validity of using the infinite rod approximation for a finite rod, noting that the electric field may differ significantly along the axis of a finite rod.
  • Concerns are raised about the non-uniform charge distribution on conducting rods, with higher charge density expected near the ends, complicating the calculations.
  • One participant suggests solving Laplace's equation numerically to find the electric potential and subsequently the electric field, indicating the complexity of the problem.
  • A later reply emphasizes the need for a rough estimate of the maximum charge to begin modeling, questioning the utility of the infinite rod estimation for this purpose.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty regarding the applicability of different models for calculating the electric field and charge distribution on the rods. There is no consensus on a definitive method to estimate the maximum charge.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the assumptions made regarding the charge distribution and the applicability of infinite rod approximations to finite rods. The discussion remains open to various approaches without resolving the mathematical complexities involved.

rijulg
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I am trying to charge a system of two metal rods, of definite length, placed a certain distance apart. But before setting up the rods and hooking them to any battery, i wish to know the magnitude of charge that will be accumulated on the rods and what is the maximum possible charge on the rods, so as to just prevent electrical discharge
 
Physics news on Phys.org
we know that field of a charged rod (infinite, or finite near center) is ~ E= λ/(2πϵr), and maximum possible electric field is 3 x 10^6 N/C, so putting the values we get relation between λ and r, knowing length of rod, we can calculate maximum charge on one rod with respect to radius of cross section of rod. But i doubt the applicability and validity of this method
 
rijulg said:
But i doubt the applicability and validity of this method

Why?
 
jtbell said:
Why?

because this approximation is for infinite charge rod, and for a finite charge rod, the field might be more on the axis, so when i will charge my rod according to calculations of infinite rod, it may discharge from the axis
 
Ah, I overlooked the "definite length" in your first post. It seems you want the electric field at all points near a cylinder with given length. This is not a simple problem, even if the cylinder has a circular cross-section (the most symmetric situation) and the charge is uniform. The field does not have the same strength or direction everywhere on the surface. It's not like an infinite circular cylinder where you can assume the field is perpendicular to the surface of the cylinder.

Also, you're using conducting (metal) rods, which means the charge is not uniformly distributed. It's all at the surface of the rods, and with probably a higher (surface) charge density near the ends of the rod.

I think you have to solve Laplace's equation numerically for the electric potential, with the condition that the surfaces of the rods are equipotentials, then find the electric field by taking the gradient of the potential. Maybe someone else has a better idea.
 
jtbell said:
Ah, I overlooked the "definite length" in your first post. It seems you want the electric field at all points near a cylinder with given length. This is not a simple problem, even if the cylinder has a circular cross-section (the most symmetric situation) and the charge is uniform. The field does not have the same strength or direction everywhere on the surface. It's not like an infinite circular cylinder where you can assume the field is perpendicular to the surface of the cylinder.

Also, you're using conducting (metal) rods, which means the charge is not uniformly distributed. It's all at the surface of the rods, and with probably a higher (surface) charge density near the ends of the rod.

I think you have to solve Laplace's equation numerically for the electric potential, with the condition that the surfaces of the rods are equipotentials, then find the electric field by taking the gradient of the potential. Maybe someone else has a better idea.

Actually i need very less out of the problem, i just need to find out the maximum amount of charge possible on the rod, even a rough estimate and then i will charge it with somewhat lesser charge than the acquired answer, but to find out that rough estimate i am not sure if infinite rod estimation will be of any actual use, if someone can even just give a way to find out an assuring approximation of max. charge so that i can start building a model, it would be great
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K