Charging potential vs time graph.

AI Thread Summary
In discussions about the charging potential versus time graph, the use of "t" instead of "x" is clarified as a representation of time, with "tau" (τ) indicating the time constant. The conversation highlights that graphs often use time constants to normalize data, allowing for consistent comparisons across different resistor-capacitor (R-C) circuits. This normalization makes the plots scale-invariant, preserving the nature of the graph despite variations in R and C values. The distinction between "t" and "τ" is emphasized, noting that both have time units, while the numbers on the axes are dimensionless. Overall, using time constants enhances the clarity and utility of the graphs in analyzing circuit behavior.
dE_logics
Messages
742
Reaction score
0
Why don't we simply take t as x? why is it t?

Where is the time constant.

If you're looking at a question mark instead of the symbol "tau"...you know its tau.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dE_logics said:
Why don't we simply take t as x? why is it t?
You might get an answer if you explained what the question is.

AM
 
On one axis we have the charging current/voltage, while on the other instead of time (t) we have t ...why?


And yeah...latex is still giving problems?...I think I got a cache problem.
 
This picture shows what I'm seeing:
 

Attachments

  • question.gif
    question.gif
    5 KB · Views: 577
Actually I'm on linux, and so this website seems MS friendly.

So that 'tau' seems like a matrix in windows.

So if you encounter any sort of weird symbols, take it as 'tau' or time constant.
 
So are you trying to write t / \tau?
 
ITs t*tau not t/tau.
 
Latex just started working for me!

t \tau...this is what I mean.
 
Last edited:
:confused:

I've seen many capacitor charging/discharging graphs that use t / \tau on one of the axes, but never one that uses t \tau. Are you sure the \tau isn't a subscript, i.e. t_{\tau}?
 
  • #11
Are you referring to graphs like this one?

The horizontal scale markings indicate t = \tau, t = 2 \tau, t = 3 \tau, etc. This means the same thing as t / \tau = 1, t / \tau = 2, t / \tau = 3, etc.

The 1, 2, 3, etc. are not t's. t and \tau both have units of time, so the numbers are dimensionless.
 
  • #12
Yeah...the same thing.

So why did this \tau stuff pop by?...why not simply use time?
 
  • #13
Normalization, the time constant will vary between different values of R and C but as long as you plot the time axis in terms of the time constant then the plots will all be the same (barring differences in the magnitude of the initial voltage).
 
  • #14
Oh...you mean to maintain the nature of the graph...right?
 
  • #15
Yeah. Plotting in units of time constants allows the graph to be scale invariant with respect to the R and C of the circuit. It's the same reason why when we plot graphs of waves and such we use wavelengths as our units of space. It automatically scales the plots in such a way that the information of interest is readily seen.
 
  • #16
Humm...ok, thanks!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top