Check Answers to Quantum Minima Qs: In-State Vector Operator

  • Thread starter Thread starter Beer-monster
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around concepts in Quantum Mechanics, specifically focusing on state vectors and operators within the context of wavefunctions and expectation values.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the implications of inserting an operator between a bra and ket in the context of calculating expectation values. They question whether this leads to a collapse of the state vector to a basis vector.
  • Some participants question the interpretation of the resulting complex number from the matrix element, exploring its physical significance.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing clarifications and challenging assumptions. There is a clear exchange of ideas regarding the nature of the wavefunction and the role of operators, though no consensus has been reached on the interpretations presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating conceptual nuances in Quantum Mechanics, particularly regarding the relationship between operators and wavefunctions, without definitive conclusions on the implications of their discussions.

Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to "sure"up my Quantum Mechanics and found an sheet of mostly conceptual review questions. A sort of "Quantum minima".

I'd like to check my answers to a couple of these.

Firstly:

In terms of state vector the wavefunction is the expansion coefficient (probability amplitude) of a state i.e

\psi = \langle x \left | \psi \right\rangle

What happens if you put an operator (e.g. p) between the bra and ket as if you were calculating an expectation value? i.e.

\left\langle x \left | p \right | \psi \right \rangle

My guess is that the action of the operator on the state vector \left|\psi\right\rangle will collapse the vector to a single basis vector of p \left| p \right\rangle the expression above would reduce to an element of a basis transformation matrix \left\langle x | p \right\rangle

Is that correct...at least in part?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Not quite. The action of p on the ket psi leads to a ket phi, generally different. Then the matrix element with the bra x leads to a complex number, namely phi(x).
 
Thanks for the reply.

What would the physical interpretation of the complex number phi(x) be? The wavefunction of the state with eigenvalue of p?
 
No, it's a generic wavefunction. No relation to spectral values of p.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K