Check My Proof - Get Help w/ Problem Solving

  • Thread starter Thread starter PatternSeeker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a proof involving the relationship between angle Beta and the length of segment AB. The initial proof presented lacks clarity on how the conclusion follows from the statements made, particularly regarding the behavior of angle Beta as AB increases. It is clarified that as AB grows, angle Beta should decrease towards zero at a quadratic rate, inversely proportional to (AB)^2. Suggestions include using Taylor series to derive the relationship more accurately, emphasizing the need for a geometric approach to support the findings. Overall, the proof requires significant revision to accurately reflect the mathematical relationships involved.
PatternSeeker
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am working on a proof . Could you kindly check my work in the attachment?
Am I addressing the problem correctly? Also, am I missing any steps?

The problem is stated in the attachment. My work in progress and a relevant diagram are also included.

Thanks in advance for your help.
 

Attachments

  • MathForumJune2012.jpg
    MathForumJune2012.jpg
    23.8 KB · Views: 544
Physics news on Phys.org
Your "proof" doesn't mean anything. You list 7 fairly straight forward statements and then add the conclusion at the end. But it doesn't follow from the previous statement.

In fact, exactly what is it you are trying to prove? "Show that angle \beta will approximate 1/(AB)^2 as AB increases in length". Are you saying that in the limit as AB goes to infinity? If so then 1/(AB)^2 will go to 0. Is that what you are saying? That the angle goes to 0? Your "proof" cannot be right because it says nothing about AB "increasing". It is purely static.
 
Hi,

Thank you for answering. I see your point. A proof should reflect an increase in the length of "AB". What I would like to show is that angle Beta decreases (towards zero) at a quadratic rate. Apparently the decrease in that angle should be inversely proportional to (AB)^2. Any further suggestions will be appreciated.
 
Something is going wrong with your proof. When AB grows, you have \cos(\alpha + \beta) \rightarrow 1 + \mathcal{O}(\beta), \sin^2(\beta) \rightarrow \beta^2, so you wouldn't get the scaling you're asked for. This problem is very easy to do using Taylor series: all you need to do is to write \beta = \theta-\alphaand then expand the angles into series -- you should get something like \beta \sim \frac{AC}{AB} - \frac{AC}{AF}. Perhaps there is some geometric way of getting a similar relation?
 

Similar threads

Back
Top